CXSE vs. CNYA
CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) and CNYA (iShares MSCI China A ETF) are both China Equities funds - CXSE tracks the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index while CNYA tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CXSE returned 6.83%/yr vs 5.56%/yr for CNYA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CXSE charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CNYA.
Performance
CXSE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed CNYA with an annualized return of 6.83%, while CNYA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.56% annualized return.
CXSE
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- -7.73%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
CNYA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.56%
CXSE vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | -2.26% | 37.00% | 8.56% | -18.02% | -29.32% | -23.67% | 59.39% | 37.96% | -28.55% | 81.50% |
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 6.12% | 26.48% | 10.78% | -13.76% | -26.51% | 3.53% | 41.54% | 35.95% | -26.56% | 30.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CXSE and CNYA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CXSE and CNYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
CXSE vs. CNYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CXSE
CNYA
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
CXSE
CNYA
Consumer Cyclical
CXSE
CNYA
Industrials
CXSE
CNYA
Communication Services
CXSE
CNYA
Healthcare
CXSE
CNYA
Financial Services
CXSE
CNYA
Consumer Defensive
CXSE
CNYA
Basic Materials
CXSE
CNYA
Real Estate
CXSE
CNYA
Energy
CXSE
CNYA
Utilities
CXSE
CNYA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CXSE vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank
CXSE
CNYA
CXSE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CXSE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 3.53 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 9.24 | -8.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CXSE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and CNYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CXSE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.01% | -49.49% | -20.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -7.77% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.12% | -33.35% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.65% | -44.65% | -17.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.01% | -49.49% | -20.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.72% | -15.93% | -31.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.99% | -20.61% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 2.97% | +6.61% |
Volatility
CXSE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 7.34%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CXSE | CNYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.34% | 8.94% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 15.16% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.28% | 19.55% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.35% | 24.04% | +8.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 23.60% | +5.16% |
CXSE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CXSE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison
CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than CNYA's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNYA iShares MSCI China A ETF | 1.77% | 1.92% | 2.51% | 4.23% | 2.69% | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.21% | 3.92% | 0.97% | 1.38% | 0.00% |
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund | 1.48% | 1.95% | 1.70% | 1.71% | 1.55% | 0.86% | 0.54% | 0.96% | 1.49% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CXSE and CNYA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNYA has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to CXSE (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs CNYA's -49.49%.
On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 6.83% vs 5.56% for CNYA. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.
CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.48% for CXSE.
CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.60% for CNYA.
CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CXSE and CNYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer