PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXSE vs. CNYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXSE vs. CNYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXSE achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than CNYA's 6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CXSE has outperformed CNYA with an annualized return of 6.83%, while CNYA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.56% annualized return.


CXSE

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.67%
6M
-7.01%
YTD
-2.26%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
8.45%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*
6.83%

CNYA

1D
-0.11%
1M
-3.25%
6M
3.08%
YTD
6.12%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
9.98%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
5.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXSE vs. CNYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
-2.26%37.00%8.56%-18.02%-29.32%-23.67%59.39%37.96%-28.55%81.50%
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
6.12%26.48%10.78%-13.76%-26.51%3.53%41.54%35.95%-26.56%30.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CXSE and CNYA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016

0.76

The correlation between CXSE and CNYA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CXSE vs. CNYA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CXSE
CNYA

Technology

27.4%
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

24.6%
5.2%

Industrials

12.7%
15.4%

Communication Services

12.1%
1.3%

Healthcare

8.6%
3.9%

Financial Services

6.2%
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%
11.2%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.6%

Energy

0.4%
3.1%

Utilities

0.2%
3.3%

Technology

CXSE
27.4%
CNYA
31.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CXSE
24.6%
CNYA
5.2%

Industrials

CXSE
12.7%
CNYA
15.4%

Communication Services

CXSE
12.1%
CNYA
1.3%

Healthcare

CXSE
8.6%
CNYA
3.9%

Financial Services

CXSE
6.2%
CNYA
17.6%

Consumer Defensive

CXSE
4.0%
CNYA
6.8%

Basic Materials

CXSE
3.2%
CNYA
11.2%

Real Estate

CXSE
0.8%
CNYA
0.6%

Energy

CXSE
0.4%
CNYA
3.1%

Utilities

CXSE
0.2%
CNYA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXSE vs. CNYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CNYA
CNYA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
CNYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYA Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXSE vs. CNYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) and iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CXSECNYADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.25

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.58

3.53

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

9.24

-8.18

CXSE vs. CNYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the CNYA Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXSE and CNYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CXSE vs. CNYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXSE drawdown since its inception was -70.01%, which is greater than CNYA's maximum drawdown of -49.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXSE and CNYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXSECNYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.01%

-49.49%

-20.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

-7.77%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.12%

-33.35%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.65%

-44.65%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.01%

-49.49%

-20.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.72%

-15.93%

-31.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.99%

-20.61%

-7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.58%

2.97%

+6.61%

Volatility

CXSE vs. CNYA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) is 7.34%, while iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that CXSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXSECNYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

8.94%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

15.16%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.28%

19.55%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.35%

24.04%

+8.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.76%

23.60%

+5.16%

CXSE vs. CNYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXSE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CNYA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXSE vs. CNYA - Dividend Comparison

CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than CNYA's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNYA
iShares MSCI China A ETF
1.77%1.92%2.51%4.23%2.69%1.11%1.06%1.21%3.92%0.97%1.38%0.00%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.48%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


CXSE and CNYA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNYA has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to CXSE (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CXSE dropped -70.01% vs CNYA's -49.49%.

On 10-year performance, CXSE leads with 6.83% vs 5.56% for CNYA. On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, CXSE has been the lower-risk option at 7.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CXSE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CNYA.

CNYA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.48% for CXSE.

CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index, while CNYA tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CXSE and 0.60% for CNYA.

CNYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXSE and CNYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer