CXRN vs. AGQ

Last updated Apr 17, 2026

CXRN (Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF) and AGQ (ProShares Ultra Silver) are both Leveraged Commodities funds. CXRN is actively managed, while AGQ is passively managed. Over the past year, CXRN returned -30.78% vs 221.36% for AGQ. At 0.08, their price movements are largely independent. CXRN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AGQ.

Performance

CXRN vs. AGQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXRN achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly higher than AGQ's -16.70% return.

CXRN

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: -1.73%
• 6M: 0.42%
• 1Y: -30.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AGQ

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -3.88%
• YTD: -16.70%
• 6M: 32.64%
• 1Y: 221.36%
• 3Y*: 56.61%
• 5Y*: 22.73%
• 10Y*: 13.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXRN vs. AGQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	-1.73%	-25.68%	7.40%
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	-16.70%	360.71%	-10.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CXRN and AGQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.08

Return for Risk

CXRN vs. AGQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXRN

CXRN Risk / Return Rank: 2
CXRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CXRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CXRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CXRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CXRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

AGQ

AGQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
AGQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AGQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
AGQ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
AGQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AGQ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXRN vs. AGQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) and ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CXRN	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	1.93	-2.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.15	2.26	-3.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.40	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	3.03	-3.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	7.45	-8.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CXRN vs. AGQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXRN Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the AGQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXRN and AGQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CXRN	AGQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	1.93	-2.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.47	0.10	-0.57

Drawdowns

CXRN vs. AGQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXRN drawdown since its inception was -46.71%, smaller than the maximum AGQ drawdown of -98.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXRN and AGQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CXRN	AGQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.71%	-98.16%	+51.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.47%	-76.21%	+36.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.21%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.89%	-82.31%	+43.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.41%	-79.83%	+50.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.60%	31.01%	-2.41%

Volatility

CXRN vs. AGQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF (CXRN) is 9.59%, while ProShares Ultra Silver (AGQ) has a volatility of 33.59%. This indicates that CXRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CXRN	AGQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	33.59%	-24.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.70%	132.33%	-108.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.47%	116.47%	-82.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.78%	73.20%	-37.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.78%	64.76%	-28.98%

CXRN vs. AGQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXRN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AGQ's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

CXRN vs. AGQ - Dividend Comparison

CXRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while AGQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
CXRN Teucrium 2x Daily Corn ETF	2.77%	3.30%	0.13%
AGQ ProShares Ultra Silver	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%