CX vs. JEPQ
CX (CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, CX returned 27.50%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CX vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CX achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
CX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 19.05%
- 1Y
- 90.98%
- 3Y*
- 27.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CX vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 12.51% | 105.97% | -26.48% | 91.36% | -11.57% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between CX and JEPQ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CX vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
CX
JEPQ
CX vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.31 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 16.22 | -2.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.49 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 1.00 | -0.86 |
Drawdowns
CX vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CX drawdown since its inception was -92.37%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CX and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.37% | -20.07% | -72.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.99% | -8.82% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.38% | -20.07% | -24.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -0.10% | -38.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.18% | -3.42% | -47.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 1.79% | +4.83% |
Volatility
CX vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) has a higher volatility of 13.21% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that CX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CX | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 1.26% | +11.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.69% | 9.07% | +19.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.12% | 11.73% | +23.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.79% | 16.61% | +23.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.53% | 16.61% | +26.92% |
Dividends
CX vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
CX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CX CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.64% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CX and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CX has higher volatility (13.21%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CX dropped -92.37% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
CX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CX and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer