CWI vs. VEA
CWI (SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - CWI tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while VEA tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CWI returned 9.91%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for VEA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CWI charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
CWI vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CWI having a 9.91% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 10.17%.
CWI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 32.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
CWI vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 13.91% | 32.75% | 6.27% | 15.74% | -15.39% | 8.81% | 9.83% | 21.92% | -13.83% | 26.89% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWI and VEA is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.97 |
The correlation between CWI and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWI vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWI
VEA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
CWI
VEA
Technology
CWI
VEA
Industrials
CWI
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
CWI
VEA
Healthcare
CWI
VEA
Energy
CWI
VEA
Basic Materials
CWI
VEA
Communication Services
CWI
VEA
Consumer Defensive
CWI
VEA
Utilities
CWI
VEA
Real Estate
CWI
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWI vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
CWI
VEA
CWI vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWI | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.81 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 10.94 | -0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWI | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CWI vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWI | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -60.68% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -11.63% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -13.45% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.45% | -29.71% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.64% | -35.73% | +1.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -0.90% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -13.29% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.98% | -0.03% |
Volatility
CWI vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) have volatilities of 5.81% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWI | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 5.66% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 13.32% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.35% | 15.66% | -0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.55% | -0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.13% | 17.36% | -0.23% |
CWI vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWI vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWI SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF | 2.70% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 2.80% | 3.17% | 2.65% | 2.07% | 3.05% | 2.81% | 2.29% | 2.45% | 2.62% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CWI and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 9.91% for CWI. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.
CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.03% for VEA.
CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWI and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer