PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWI vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWI vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWI achieves a 13.91% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, CWI has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 9.91%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.


CWI

1D
-1.22%
1M
5.25%
YTD
13.91%
6M
16.33%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
9.91%

SPYM

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.06%
YTD
10.98%
6M
10.98%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWI vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
13.91%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
10.98%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between CWI and SPYM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2007

0.74

The correlation between CWI and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWI vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWI
SPYM

Financial Services

17.4%
11.1%

Technology

14.9%
38.5%

Industrials

7.8%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
9.9%

Healthcare

5.3%
8.4%

Energy

5.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
4.6%

Utilities

1.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.8%

Financial Services

CWI
17.4%
SPYM
11.1%

Technology

CWI
14.9%
SPYM
38.5%

Industrials

CWI
7.8%
SPYM
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CWI
5.8%
SPYM
9.9%

Healthcare

CWI
5.3%
SPYM
8.4%

Energy

CWI
5.0%
SPYM
3.2%

Basic Materials

CWI
4.4%
SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

CWI
3.2%
SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

CWI
2.8%
SPYM
4.6%

Utilities

CWI
1.2%
SPYM
2.5%

Real Estate

CWI
0.9%
SPYM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWI vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWI vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWISPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.17

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

14.76

-3.84

CWI vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWI and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWISPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.39

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.87

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.62

-0.37

Drawdowns

CWI vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWI drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWI and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWISPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.77%

-54.46%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-8.90%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-18.72%

+4.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.45%

-24.48%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-33.87%

-0.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.66%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-7.15%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

1.91%

+1.04%

Volatility

CWI vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) has a higher volatility of 5.81% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that CWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWISPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

2.83%

+2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

8.90%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.35%

11.80%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.80%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

18.00%

-0.87%

CWI vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWI has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWI vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

CWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWI
SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.70%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWI and SPYM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWI has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWI dropped -60.77% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 9.91% for CWI. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CWI.

CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.

CWI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. CWI tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CWI and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWI and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer