CWEB vs. TERG
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and TERG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while TERG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. CWEB is passively managed, while TERG is actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TERG.
Performance
CWEB vs. TERG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than TERG's 74.74% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.07%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- —
TERG
- 1D
- -11.75%
- 1M
- -44.81%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- YTD
- 74.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWEB vs. TERG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.10% | -11.77% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 74.74% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and TERG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. TERG — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
TERG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CWEB vs. TERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF (TERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. TERG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than TERG's maximum drawdown of -58.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and TERG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -58.90% | -39.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.56% | -58.90% | -38.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.85% | -16.56% | -49.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.43% | — | — |
Volatility
CWEB vs. TERG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | TERG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.88% | 154.92% | -100.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 154.92% | -60.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.41% | 154.92% | -74.51% |
CWEB vs. TERG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TERG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. TERG - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, while TERG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.06% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
TERG Leverage Shares 2X Long TER Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and TERG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TERG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TERG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.00% for TERG.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while TERG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.75% for TERG.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and TERG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer