CWEB vs. SPXL
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CWEB tracks the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%) while SPXL tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -45.85%/yr vs 20.70%/yr for SPXL. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
CWEB vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -52.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 17.21% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -18.42%
- YTD
- -52.10%
- 6M
- -53.54%
- 1Y
- -48.20%
- 3Y*
- -16.02%
- 5Y*
- -45.85%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.56%
- 3Y*
- 46.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.27%
CWEB vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -52.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 17.21% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and SPXL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.47 |
CWEB vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
SPXL
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
SPXL
Healthcare
CWEB
SPXL
Real Estate
CWEB
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
SPXL
Technology
CWEB
SPXL
Financial Services
CWEB
SPXL
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
SPXL
Energy
CWEB
-
SPXL
Industrials
CWEB
-
SPXL
Utilities
CWEB
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
SPXL
CWEB vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.28 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 2.35 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 9.57 | -10.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than SPXL's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -76.86% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.18% | -26.77% | -40.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.18% | -48.95% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -63.80% | -31.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.05% | -10.44% | -87.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -16.09% | -49.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.83% | 6.56% | +28.27% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 16.52% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) at 14.70%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 14.70% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.88% | 29.55% | +11.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.27% | 37.43% | +16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.57% | 50.54% | +44.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.54% | 53.47% | +27.07% |
CWEB vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than SPXL's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 7.05% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and SPXL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (16.52%) compared to SPXL (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 5-year performance, SPXL leads with 20.70% vs -45.85% for CWEB. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, SPXL has been the lower-risk option at 14.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 20.70% return vs -45.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 0.57% for SPXL.
CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SPXL tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer