CWEB vs. SPUU
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SPUU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -40.57%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for SPUU. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
CWEB vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 18.22% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.07%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- YTD
- 18.22%
- 1Y
- 38.38%
- 3Y*
- 32.90%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.84%
CWEB vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 18.22% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and SPUU is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.46 |
The correlation between CWEB and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
SPUU
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
CWEB
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
SPUU
Healthcare
CWEB
SPUU
Real Estate
CWEB
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
SPUU
Technology
CWEB
SPUU
Financial Services
CWEB
SPUU
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
SPUU
Energy
CWEB
-
SPUU
Industrials
CWEB
-
SPUU
Utilities
CWEB
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
SPUU
CWEB vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.27 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.12 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 8.78 | -9.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -59.35% | -38.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -18.19% | -51.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -35.18% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.46% | -46.59% | -47.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.56% | -2.59% | -94.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.85% | -9.45% | -56.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.43% | 4.38% | +34.05% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 17.07% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 6.85%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | 6.85% | +10.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | 20.13% | +20.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.88% | 25.27% | +29.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 33.69% | +60.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.41% | 35.75% | +44.66% |
CWEB vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than SPUU's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.06% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.33% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and SPUU have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (17.07%) compared to SPUU (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 5-year performance, SPUU leads with 18.77% vs -40.57% for CWEB. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 18.77% return vs -40.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 1.33% for SPUU.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while SPUU is Leveraged Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.60% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer