CWEB vs. NUGT
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -40.57%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for NUGT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
CWEB vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.10% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -43.28% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- 3.40%
- 1M
- 11.42%
- 6M
- -47.01%
- YTD
- -40.10%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -14.07%
- 5Y*
- -40.57%
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -34.26%
- 6M
- -55.58%
- YTD
- -43.28%
- 1Y
- 42.42%
- 3Y*
- 40.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.60%
- 10Y*
- -15.94%
CWEB vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.10% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -79.35% | 116.38% | 51.24% | -63.01% | 166.27% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -43.28% | 425.05% | 2.89% | 2.60% | -32.10% | -26.31% | -60.16% | 100.73% | -44.52% | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and NUGT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between CWEB and NUGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CWEB vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
NUGT
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
NUGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
NUGT
-
Healthcare
CWEB
NUGT
-
Real Estate
CWEB
NUGT
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
NUGT
-
Technology
CWEB
NUGT
-
Financial Services
CWEB
NUGT
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
NUGT
Energy
CWEB
-
NUGT
-
Industrials
CWEB
-
NUGT
-
Utilities
CWEB
-
NUGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
NUGT
CWEB vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CWEB | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.16 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.64 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 1.38 | -2.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.18%, roughly equal to the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.18% | -99.97% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.36% | -66.74% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.36% | -66.74% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.46% | -73.72% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.56% | -99.87% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.85% | -91.56% | +25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.43% | 30.85% | +7.58% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) is 17.07%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a volatility of 23.78%. This indicates that CWEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.07% | 23.78% | -6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.45% | 80.17% | -39.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.88% | 95.33% | -40.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.37% | 73.34% | +21.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.41% | 87.69% | -7.28% |
CWEB vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than NUGT's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 6.06% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.69% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and NUGT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NUGT has higher volatility (23.78%) compared to CWEB (17.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.18% vs NUGT's -99.97%.
On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 13.60% vs -40.57% for CWEB. On fees, NUGT is cheaper at 1.13% per year. On volatility, CWEB has been the lower-risk option at 17.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 13.60% return vs -40.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUGT is cheaper with a 1.13% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 6.06%, compared with 0.69% for NUGT.
CWEB is categorized as China Equities, while NUGT is Gold. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 1.13% for NUGT.
NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer