PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWEB vs. KSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CWEB vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.28% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 32.94% return.


CWEB

1D
-7.70%
1M
-11.08%
YTD
-40.28%
6M
-43.77%
1Y
-33.98%
3Y*
-10.47%
5Y*
-43.77%
10Y*

KSTR

1D
1.39%
1M
7.01%
YTD
32.94%
6M
38.23%
1Y
83.76%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CWEB vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares
-40.28%29.04%0.12%-32.85%-59.43%-84.41%
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
32.94%42.82%6.12%-17.93%-38.51%-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CWEB and KSTR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.47

The correlation between CWEB and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

CWEB vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CWEB
KSTR

Communication Services

40.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

38.4%
1.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.1%

Real Estate

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Technology

3.7%
78.5%

Financial Services

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.6%

Energy

-

0.9%

Industrials

-

6.5%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

CWEB
40.0%
KSTR

-

Consumer Cyclical

CWEB
38.4%
KSTR
1.4%

Healthcare

CWEB
6.8%
KSTR
4.1%

Real Estate

CWEB
4.8%
KSTR

-

Consumer Defensive

CWEB
4.4%
KSTR

-

Technology

CWEB
3.7%
KSTR
78.5%

Financial Services

CWEB
2.0%
KSTR

-

Basic Materials

CWEB

-

KSTR
0.6%

Energy

CWEB

-

KSTR
0.9%

Industrials

CWEB

-

KSTR
6.5%

Utilities

CWEB

-

KSTR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWEB vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWEB
CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

KSTR
KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWEB vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWEBKSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.40

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

4.76

-5.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

12.06

-13.13

CWEB vs. KSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the KSTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWEB and KSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWEBKSTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

2.37

-3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

-0.01

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

-0.00

-0.25

Drawdowns

CWEB vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and KSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CWEBKSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.09%

-66.46%

-31.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.58%

-17.70%

-42.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.58%

-41.55%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.63%

-66.46%

-29.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.57%

-10.98%

-86.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.42%

-38.77%

-26.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.81%

6.97%

+24.84%

Volatility

CWEB vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) at 15.14%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CWEBKSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.74%

15.14%

+7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.10%

26.21%

+13.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.37%

35.48%

+18.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.49%

38.31%

+56.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.70%

37.68%

+43.02%

CWEB vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

CWEB vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison

CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares
5.65%2.77%4.59%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%1.59%2.98%
KSTR
KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CWEB and KSTR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CWEB has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to KSTR (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs KSTR's -66.46%.

On 5-year performance, KSTR leads with -0.21% vs -43.77% for CWEB. On fees, KSTR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, KSTR has been the lower-risk option at 15.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KSTR has performed better with a -0.21% return vs -43.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KSTR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.

CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.

CWEB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KSTR is China Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.89% for KSTR.

KSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CWEB and KSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer