CWEB vs. KSTR
CWEB (Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CWEB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while KSTR is a China Equities fund tracking the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CWEB returned -43.77%/yr vs -0.21%/yr for KSTR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CWEB charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.
Performance
CWEB vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -40.28% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR's 32.94% return.
CWEB
- 1D
- -7.70%
- 1M
- -11.08%
- YTD
- -40.28%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- 1Y
- -33.98%
- 3Y*
- -10.47%
- 5Y*
- -43.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- YTD
- 32.94%
- 6M
- 38.23%
- 1Y
- 83.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CWEB vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | -40.28% | 29.04% | 0.12% | -32.85% | -59.43% | -84.41% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 32.94% | 42.82% | 6.12% | -17.93% | -38.51% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWEB and KSTR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.47 |
The correlation between CWEB and KSTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
CWEB vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CWEB
KSTR
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
CWEB
KSTR
-
Consumer Cyclical
CWEB
KSTR
Healthcare
CWEB
KSTR
Real Estate
CWEB
KSTR
-
Consumer Defensive
CWEB
KSTR
-
Technology
CWEB
KSTR
Financial Services
CWEB
KSTR
-
Basic Materials
CWEB
-
KSTR
Energy
CWEB
-
KSTR
Industrials
CWEB
-
KSTR
Utilities
CWEB
-
KSTR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CWEB vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank
CWEB
KSTR
CWEB vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CWEB | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.40 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 4.76 | -5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 12.06 | -13.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CWEB | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 2.37 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 | -0.01 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | -0.00 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
CWEB vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than KSTR's maximum drawdown of -66.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and KSTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CWEB | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -66.46% | -31.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.58% | -17.70% | -42.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.58% | -41.55% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.63% | -66.46% | -29.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.57% | -10.98% | -86.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.42% | -38.77% | -26.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.81% | 6.97% | +24.84% |
Volatility
CWEB vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) at 15.14%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CWEB | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.74% | 15.14% | +7.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.10% | 26.21% | +13.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.37% | 35.48% | +18.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.49% | 38.31% | +56.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.70% | 37.68% | +43.02% |
CWEB vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWEB has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
CWEB vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison
CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, while KSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWEB Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares | 5.65% | 2.77% | 4.59% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 1.59% | 2.98% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CWEB and KSTR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWEB has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to KSTR (15.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CWEB dropped -98.09% vs KSTR's -66.46%.
On 5-year performance, KSTR leads with -0.21% vs -43.77% for CWEB. On fees, KSTR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, KSTR has been the lower-risk option at 15.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KSTR has performed better with a -0.21% return vs -43.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KSTR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CWEB.
CWEB has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.00% for KSTR.
CWEB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KSTR is China Equities. CWEB tracks CSI China Overseas Internet Index (200%), while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CWEB and 0.89% for KSTR.
KSTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CWEB and KSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer