PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWEB vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWEB vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWEB vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares
-32.69%29.04%0.12%-32.85%-59.43%-79.35%116.38%51.24%-63.01%166.27%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-6.56%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWEB achieves a -32.69% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's -6.56% return.


CWEB

1D
5.19%
1M
-17.05%
YTD
-32.69%
6M
-51.81%
1Y
-35.59%
3Y*
-16.49%
5Y*
-45.09%
10Y*

AAPL

1D
2.90%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
-6.56%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
14.75%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
16.20%
10Y*
26.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CWEB vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWEB
CWEB Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWEB vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWEBAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.61

0.47

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

0.92

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.13

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

0.74

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.53

2.30

-3.83

CWEB vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWEB Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWEB and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWEBAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

0.47

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

0.59

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.43

-0.68

Correlation

The correlation between CWEB and AAPL is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CWEB vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

CWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than AAPL's 0.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CWEB
Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares
5.02%2.77%4.59%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%1.59%2.98%0.00%0.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.41%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%

Drawdowns

CWEB vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWEB drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWEB and AAPL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWEBAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.09%

-81.80%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.15%

-22.99%

-33.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.62%

-33.36%

-63.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.26%

-11.24%

-86.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.83%

-29.71%

-35.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.72%

7.38%

+16.34%

Volatility

CWEB vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily CSI China Internet Index Bull 2x Shares (CWEB) has a higher volatility of 18.23% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.58%. This indicates that CWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWEBAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.23%

5.58%

+12.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.34%

15.09%

+23.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.92%

31.66%

+27.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.41%

27.46%

+66.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.97%

28.94%

+52.03%