CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CW8U.L (Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD) and PUST.PA (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CW8U.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PUST.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CW8U.L returned 12.85%/yr vs 21.49%/yr for PUST.PA. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CW8U.L charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for PUST.PA.

Performance

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CW8U.L is traded in USD, while PUST.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PUST.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CW8U.L achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than PUST.PA's 19.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CW8U.L has underperformed PUST.PA with an annualized return of 12.85%, while PUST.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.49% annualized return.

CW8U.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 10.88%
• 1Y: 25.61%
• 3Y*: 20.52%
• 5Y*: 11.60%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

PUST.PA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 8.54%
• YTD: 19.51%
• 6M: 18.94%
• 1Y: 39.81%
• 3Y*: 27.71%
• 5Y*: 17.45%
• 10Y*: 21.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CW8U.L Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD	9.80%	20.32%	19.03%	24.06%	-18.23%	22.09%	15.78%	28.00%	-9.95%	22.67%
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc	19.51%	19.91%	26.96%	54.80%	-33.98%	29.29%	48.09%	37.68%	-0.23%	32.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CW8U.L and PUST.PA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014	0.79

The correlation between CW8U.L and PUST.PA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CW8U.L

CW8U.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CW8U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CW8U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CW8U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CW8U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

PUST.PA

PUST.PA Risk / Return Rank: 70
PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PUST.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
PUST.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PUST.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PUST.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) and Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CW8U.L	PUST.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.51	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.44	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	3.59	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.87	13.36	-0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CW8U.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the PUST.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CW8U.L and PUST.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CW8U.L	PUST.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.51	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.83	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	1.06	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.98	-0.24

Drawdowns

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CW8U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.10%, roughly equal to the maximum PUST.PA drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW8U.L and PUST.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CW8U.L	PUST.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.10%	-35.20%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-10.93%	+2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-23.12%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.79%	-35.20%	+9.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.10%	-35.20%	+1.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.82%	+0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-5.86%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	2.96%	-0.98%

Volatility

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS USD (CW8U.L) is 3.27%, while Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that CW8U.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PUST.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CW8U.L	PUST.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	4.57%	-1.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	11.35%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	15.64%	-3.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	20.60%	-5.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.84%	20.01%	-4.17%

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CW8U.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PUST.PA's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CW8U.L vs. PUST.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CW8U.L nor PUST.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CW8U.L and PUST.PA in my portfolio?

CW8U.L and PUST.PA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CW8U.L or PUST.PA?

On fees, CW8U.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CW8U.L or PUST.PA?

CW8U.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PUST.PA.

What is the main difference between CW8U.L and PUST.PA?

CW8U.L is categorized as Global Equities, while PUST.PA is Nasdaq-100. CW8U.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while PUST.PA tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CW8U.L and 0.30% for PUST.PA.