CW vs. ASM
CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and ASM (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) are both stocks. CW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ASM operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, CW returned 25.85%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for ASM. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CW vs. ASM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CW achieves a 38.89% return, which is significantly higher than ASM's -5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, CW has outperformed ASM with an annualized return of 25.85%, while ASM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.
CW
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 38.89%
- 6M
- 34.43%
- 1Y
- 60.98%
- 3Y*
- 64.56%
- 5Y*
- 45.11%
- 10Y*
- 25.85%
ASM
- 1D
- -8.41%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -5.31%
- 6M
- -13.91%
- 1Y
- 69.94%
- 3Y*
- 107.69%
- 5Y*
- 38.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
CW vs. ASM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 38.89% | 55.66% | 59.73% | 33.98% | 21.03% | 19.86% | -16.83% | 38.70% | -15.79% | 24.56% |
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | -5.31% | 604.88% | 68.13% | -22.95% | -21.01% | -33.77% | 124.14% | -4.92% | -54.48% | -2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CW and ASM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.12 |
Over the past year, CW and ASM have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CW:
$28.35B
ASM:
$1.02B
CW:
$13.64
ASM:
$0.23
CW:
56.10
ASM:
25.88
CW:
3.06
ASM:
0.08
CW:
7.95
ASM:
8.62
CW:
10.77
ASM:
3.70
CW:
$3.61B
ASM:
$110.70M
CW:
$1.34B
ASM:
$59.09M
CW:
$745.31M
ASM:
$55.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CW vs. ASM — Risk / Return Rank
CW
ASM
CW vs. ASM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CW | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 1.34 | +3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 2.77 | +10.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CW vs. ASM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CW drawdown since its inception was -59.19%, smaller than the maximum ASM drawdown of -94.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CW and ASM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CW | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.19% | -94.10% | +34.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.97% | -52.40% | +39.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.21% | -52.40% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.21% | -63.94% | +36.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.73% | -90.91% | +42.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.38% | -47.69% | +45.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.88% | -63.74% | +49.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 25.37% | -20.91% |
Volatility
CW vs. ASM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is 8.97%, while Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a volatility of 27.33%. This indicates that CW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CW | ASM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 27.33% | -18.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.58% | 66.16% | -40.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.04% | 82.61% | -49.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.86% | 66.18% | -38.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.29% | 69.80% | -39.51% |
Dividends
CW vs. ASM - Dividend Comparison
CW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CW Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.51% | 0.58% | 0.47% | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.76% |
Financials
CW vs. ASM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CW vs. ASM - Profitability Comparison
CW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.
ASM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a gross profit of 25.51M and revenue of 41.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
CW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
ASM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported an operating income of 21.76M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.5%.
CW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.
ASM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. reported a net income of 15.69M and revenue of 41.41M, resulting in a net margin of 37.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CW and ASM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASM has higher volatility (27.33%) compared to CW (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CW dropped -59.19% vs ASM's -94.10%.
CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CW and ASM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer