CVY vs. EAOM
CVY (Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF) and EAOM (iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - CVY tracks the Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index while EAOM tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CVY returned 7.04%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for EAOM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CVY charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOM.
Performance
CVY vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly higher than EAOM's 5.08% return.
CVY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 17.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
EAOM
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 14.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CVY vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 7.59% | 11.00% | 10.28% | 17.87% | -9.27% | 25.31% | 20.48% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 5.08% | 12.90% | 7.29% | 11.83% | -15.48% | 6.39% | 10.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVY and EAOM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between CVY and EAOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
CVY vs. EAOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVY
EAOM
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
CVY
EAOM
Energy
CVY
EAOM
Real Estate
CVY
EAOM
Technology
CVY
EAOM
Consumer Cyclical
CVY
EAOM
Industrials
CVY
EAOM
Healthcare
CVY
EAOM
Basic Materials
CVY
EAOM
Communication Services
CVY
EAOM
Consumer Defensive
CVY
EAOM
Utilities
CVY
EAOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVY vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank
CVY
EAOM
CVY vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVY | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.85 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 12.53 | -4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVY | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.29 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.76 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
CVY vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than EAOM's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and EAOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVY | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -20.73% | -46.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.43% | -5.17% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.79% | -7.63% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.58% | -20.73% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.45% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -4.97% | -5.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 1.17% | +1.04% |
Volatility
CVY vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) has a higher volatility of 2.87% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 2.31%. This indicates that CVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVY | EAOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.31% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.81% | 5.24% | +2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.00% | 6.44% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 8.07% | +8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 7.91% | +11.65% |
CVY vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVY vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison
CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than EAOM's 2.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVY Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | 3.75% | 3.99% | 4.07% | 4.41% | 5.18% | 2.37% | 3.40% | 3.22% | 4.44% | 3.94% | 4.50% | 5.89% |
EAOM iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.78% | 2.89% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 1.93% | 1.32% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVY and EAOM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CVY has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to EAOM (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs EAOM's -20.73%.
On 5-year performance, CVY leads with 7.04% vs 4.28% for EAOM. On fees, EAOM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOM has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, CVY has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EAOM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.
CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.78% for EAOM.
CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while EAOM tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Moderate Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.18% for EAOM.
EAOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVY and EAOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer