PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVY vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVY vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVY achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 33.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CVY has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 8.55%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


CVY

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.29%
YTD
8.95%
6M
10.21%
1Y
19.86%
3Y*
15.82%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
8.55%

VGT

1D
1.27%
1M
19.95%
YTD
33.62%
6M
32.71%
1Y
65.14%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
23.05%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVY vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
8.95%11.00%10.28%17.87%-9.27%25.31%-10.56%25.97%-10.77%15.91%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
33.62%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CVY and VGT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2006

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between CVY and VGT has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

CVY vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVY
VGT

Financial Services

38.3%
0.5%

Energy

20.1%
0.3%

Real Estate

11.8%

-

Technology

5.7%
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
0.1%

Industrials

4.8%
0.4%

Healthcare

4.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
0.0%

Communication Services

3.1%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Financial Services

CVY
38.3%
VGT
0.5%

Energy

CVY
20.1%
VGT
0.3%

Real Estate

CVY
11.8%
VGT

-

Technology

CVY
5.7%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

CVY
5.4%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

CVY
4.8%
VGT
0.4%

Healthcare

CVY
4.5%
VGT
0.0%

Basic Materials

CVY
4.3%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

CVY
3.1%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

CVY
1.5%
VGT

-

Utilities

CVY
0.6%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVY vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVY
CVY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVY vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVYVGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.83

3.19

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

3.88

-1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

4.06

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.11

13.01

-3.89

CVY vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVY and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVYVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

3.19

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.06

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.68

-0.41

Drawdowns

CVY vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVY drawdown since its inception was -66.86%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVY and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVYVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.86%

-54.63%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-16.40%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-27.23%

+10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.58%

-35.07%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.47%

-35.07%

-15.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.41%

-7.95%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

5.12%

-2.91%

Volatility

CVY vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) is 2.66%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that CVY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVYVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

5.98%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

15.98%

-8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

20.52%

-9.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

25.17%

-8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

24.60%

-5.04%

CVY vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVY has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVY vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

CVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VGT's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
3.70%3.99%4.07%4.41%5.18%2.37%3.40%3.22%4.44%3.94%4.50%5.89%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.30%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVY and VGT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to CVY (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVY dropped -66.86% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.97% vs 8.55% for CVY. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CVY has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 8.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.

CVY has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.30% for VGT.

CVY is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while VGT is Technology Equities. CVY tracks Zacks Multi-Asset Income Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for CVY and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVY and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer