CVRD vs. TOLZ
CVRD (Madison Covered Call ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVRD is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Madison, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. CVRD is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. Over the past year, CVRD returned 9.30% vs 13.97% for TOLZ. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CVRD charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVRD achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.31% return.
CVRD
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 9.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 2.84% | 5.94% | 4.90% | 5.15% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 11.31% | 14.76% | 11.67% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVRD and TOLZ is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CVRD and TOLZ has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CVRD
TOLZ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Technology
CVRD
TOLZ
Financial Services
CVRD
TOLZ
Consumer Defensive
CVRD
TOLZ
Consumer Cyclical
CVRD
TOLZ
Communication Services
CVRD
TOLZ
-
Industrials
CVRD
TOLZ
Energy
CVRD
TOLZ
Healthcare
CVRD
TOLZ
-
Real Estate
CVRD
TOLZ
Basic Materials
CVRD
TOLZ
-
Utilities
CVRD
TOLZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVRD vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
CVRD
TOLZ
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVRD | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.71 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 8.20 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVRD | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.41 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVRD drawdown since its inception was -17.95%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVRD and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVRD | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.95% | -39.33% | +21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -5.18% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -3.13% | +1.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -6.63% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.71% | +0.09% |
Volatility
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Covered Call ETF (CVRD) is 2.61%, while ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that CVRD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVRD | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 3.37% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 8.20% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 10.29% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 13.99% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.82% | 16.29% | -4.47% |
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVRD has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVRD vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
CVRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRD Madison Covered Call ETF | 7.54% | 7.63% | 15.70% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.66% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVRD and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TOLZ has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to CVRD (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVRD dropped -17.95% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.
On 1-year performance, TOLZ leads with 13.97% vs 9.30% for CVRD. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, CVRD has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TOLZ has performed better with a 13.97% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CVRD.
CVRD has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 3.66% for TOLZ.
CVRD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Madison and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CVRD and 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CVRD and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer