PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVNY vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVNY vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVNY achieves a -16.37% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.


CVNY

1D
3.36%
1M
0.39%
YTD
-16.37%
6M
-19.84%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.01%
1M
37.47%
YTD
10.46%
6M
14.06%
1Y
97.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVNY vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CVNY and WNTR is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVNY vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVNY
CVNY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CVNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVNY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CVNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVNY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVNY vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVNYWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

2.29

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

5.85

-5.49

CVNY vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVNY and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVNY vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVNY drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, roughly equal to the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVNY and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVNYWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.27%

-42.65%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.27%

-42.65%

+6.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.74%

-9.88%

-14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-20.93%

+7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.92%

16.70%

+0.22%

Volatility

CVNY vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF (CVNY) is 15.83%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that CVNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVNYWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.83%

17.54%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.03%

45.99%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.85%

52.83%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.96%

53.10%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.96%

53.10%

+4.86%

CVNY vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVNY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVNY vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

CVNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 111.14%, more than WNTR's 96.66% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CVNY and WNTR have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to CVNY (15.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVNY dropped -43.27% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 5.94% for CVNY. On fees, CVNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CVNY has been the lower-risk option at 15.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

CVNY has the higher dividend yield at 111.14%, compared with 96.66% for WNTR.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CVNY and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVNY and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer