PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. PTMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMC vs. PTMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than PTMC's 14.52% return.


CVMC

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.42%
YTD
16.76%
6M
15.31%
1Y
26.59%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
10Y*

PTMC

1D
-1.09%
1M
2.59%
YTD
14.52%
6M
12.35%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. PTMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
16.76%9.52%12.57%6.14%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
14.52%-1.55%13.22%-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and PTMC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.86

The correlation between CVMC and PTMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. PTMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. PTMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVMCPTMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.18

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

7.95

+3.49

CVMC vs. PTMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the PTMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and PTMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. PTMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than PTMC's maximum drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and PTMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCPTMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-20.53%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-8.89%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-15.31%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.16%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-6.44%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.44%

-0.11%

Volatility

CVMC vs. PTMC - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) at 4.57%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMCPTMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.57%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

11.80%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

15.70%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

13.25%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

12.97%

+3.57%

CVMC vs. PTMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PTMC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVMC vs. PTMC - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than PTMC's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.20%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.61%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, CVMC and PTMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVMC has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PTMC (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs PTMC's -20.53%.

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.39% vs 10.71% for PTMC. On fees, CVMC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.39% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVMC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.20% for CVMC.

CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.60% for PTMC.

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMC and PTMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer