PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. DEUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMC vs. DEUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than DEUS's 15.73% return.


CVMC

1D
1.14%
1M
0.45%
6M
15.46%
YTD
20.24%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.82%

DEUS

1D
0.53%
1M
1.84%
6M
10.76%
YTD
15.73%
1Y
21.67%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
11.41%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$233.55K$229.94K$243.24K
$638.57K$826.95K$989.73K

CVMC vs. DEUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
20.24%9.52%12.57%6.14%
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
15.73%10.41%14.33%8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and DEUS is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.95

The correlation between CVMC and DEUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVMC vs. DEUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVMC
DEUS

Industrials

20.1%
18.7%

Technology

17.3%
10.5%

Financial Services

15.7%
13.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.1%

Real Estate

7.8%
5.6%

Utilities

5.8%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
7.5%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.2%

Energy

0.3%
5.2%

Industrials

CVMC
20.1%
DEUS
18.7%

Technology

CVMC
17.3%
DEUS
10.5%

Financial Services

CVMC
15.7%
DEUS
13.8%

Healthcare

CVMC
12.8%
DEUS
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CVMC
9.2%
DEUS
11.1%

Real Estate

CVMC
7.8%
DEUS
5.6%

Utilities

CVMC
5.8%
DEUS
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

CVMC
5.2%
DEUS
7.5%

Basic Materials

CVMC
3.0%
DEUS
4.1%

Communication Services

CVMC
2.8%
DEUS
3.2%

Energy

CVMC
0.3%
DEUS
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. DEUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DEUS
DEUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVMC vs. DEUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVMCDEUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.19

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.93

12.26

-0.33

CVMC vs. DEUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the DEUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and DEUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. DEUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum DEUS drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and DEUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCDEUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-40.47%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-6.83%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-16.69%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-1.01%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-4.28%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.77%

+0.54%

Volatility

CVMC vs. DEUS - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) at 3.05%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMCDEUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.05%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.98%

8.23%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

11.14%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

15.49%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

17.95%

-1.58%

CVMC vs. DEUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DEUS's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVMC vs. DEUS - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than DEUS's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.17%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEUS
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF
1.38%1.59%1.36%1.49%1.74%1.14%1.61%1.65%1.77%1.31%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, CVMC and DEUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVMC has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to DEUS (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs DEUS's -40.47%.

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 15.97% vs 15.79% for DEUS. On fees, CVMC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DEUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 15.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVMC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.17% for CVMC.

CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while DEUS tracks Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.17% for DEUS.

DEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMC and DEUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer