CVLC vs. BUFX
CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
CVLC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVLC achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.14% return.
CVLC
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 31.25%
- 3Y*
- 22.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVLC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 13.18% | 12.90% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.14% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between CVLC and BUFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CVLC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
CVLC
BUFX
CVLC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVLC | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVLC | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 2.70 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
CVLC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVLC and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVLC | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.92% | -2.87% | -17.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -0.24% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility
CVLC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CVLC | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.49% | 3.99% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 3.99% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 3.99% | +11.56% |
CVLC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
CVLC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
CVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF | 0.89% | 1.02% | 1.03% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CVLC and BUFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
CVLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
CVLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVLC and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for CVLC and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer