PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVISX vs. MVCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVISX achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than MVCAX's 15.06% return. Over the past 10 years, CVISX has outperformed MVCAX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while MVCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


CVISX

1D
2.53%
1M
4.63%
6M
7.27%
YTD
16.21%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
10.61%

MVCAX

1D
-0.43%
1M
1.47%
6M
10.86%
YTD
15.06%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.14%
ALL TIME*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
16.21%32.93%9.71%26.74%-11.51%21.30%2.48%18.55%-21.34%34.52%
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
15.06%6.09%13.57%12.51%-8.96%30.43%4.03%30.57%-11.69%13.37%

Correlation

The correlation between CVISX and MVCAX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.59

The correlation between CVISX and MVCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVISX vs. MVCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVISX
CVISX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CVISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVISX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CVISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVISX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MVCAX
MVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVISXMVCAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.26

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.05

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

7.09

+1.38

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the MVCAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVISX and MVCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVISX drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, smaller than the maximum MVCAX drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVISX and MVCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVISXMVCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-60.41%

+11.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-9.39%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-21.05%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-21.05%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-42.79%

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-1.37%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-8.08%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

2.72%

+0.59%

Volatility

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Volatility Comparison

Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to MFS Mid Cap Value Fund (MVCAX) at 3.37%. This indicates that CVISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVISXMVCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

3.37%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

9.73%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

13.45%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.15%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

19.18%

-2.43%

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVISX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MVCAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVISX vs. MVCAX - Dividend Comparison

CVISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.25%, more than MVCAX's 7.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
14.25%16.56%10.60%6.14%2.75%3.48%3.42%3.57%2.91%8.23%2.78%2.00%
MVCAX
MFS Mid Cap Value Fund
7.13%8.21%10.99%2.73%5.22%5.70%0.80%2.03%6.36%3.36%0.07%4.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVISX and MVCAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVISX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to MVCAX (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVISX dropped -48.50% vs MVCAX's -60.41%.

CVISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVISX and MVCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer