PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVISX vs. DRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVISX achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than DRGTX's 26.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CVISX has underperformed DRGTX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while DRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.77% annualized return.


CVISX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
14.06%
6M
14.29%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
23.12%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
11.60%

DRGTX

1D
2.96%
1M
6.03%
YTD
26.92%
6M
25.93%
1Y
53.96%
3Y*
34.23%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
23.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
14.06%32.93%9.71%26.74%-11.51%21.30%2.48%18.55%-21.34%34.52%
DRGTX
Virtus Technology Fund
26.92%25.10%35.67%65.59%-42.58%12.14%70.02%29.46%5.06%47.17%

Correlation

The correlation between CVISX and DRGTX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.52

The correlation between CVISX and DRGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVISX vs. DRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVISX
CVISX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CVISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVISX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CVISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVISX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DRGTX
DRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
DRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) and Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVISXDRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.37

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.55

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

7.78

+1.39

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVISX and DRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVISX drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, smaller than the maximum DRGTX drawdown of -83.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVISX and DRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVISXDRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.50%

-83.33%

+34.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-20.78%

+10.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-29.46%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-49.05%

+23.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.50%

-49.05%

+0.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-3.31%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-29.91%

+21.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

6.80%

-3.70%

Volatility

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Causeway International Small Cap Fund (CVISX) is 5.25%, while Virtus Technology Fund (DRGTX) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that CVISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVISXDRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

11.26%

-6.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

19.57%

-7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

24.09%

-9.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

28.84%

-12.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.83%

27.06%

-10.23%

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVISX has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGTX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

CVISX vs. DRGTX - Dividend Comparison

CVISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.52%, more than DRGTX's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVISX
Causeway International Small Cap Fund
14.52%16.56%10.60%6.14%2.75%3.48%3.42%3.57%2.91%8.23%2.78%2.00%
DRGTX
Virtus Technology Fund
1.97%2.51%0.00%0.00%18.86%28.27%16.84%17.12%21.77%16.26%5.15%15.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVISX and DRGTX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRGTX has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to CVISX (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVISX dropped -48.50% vs DRGTX's -83.33%.

DRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVISX and DRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer