CVIE vs. IPOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS).
CVIE and IPOS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CVIE is a passively managed fund by Calvert that tracks the performance of the Calvert International Responsible Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2023. IPOS is a passively managed fund by Renaissance Capital that tracks the performance of the Renaissance International IPO Index. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. Both CVIE and IPOS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CVIE vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CVIE vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVIE Calvert International Responsible Index ETF | 2.72% | 33.23% | 5.37% | 8.48% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 9.58% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -23.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CVIE achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 9.58% return.
CVIE
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.72%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 45.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- -11.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CVIE vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CVIE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CVIE vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
CVIE
IPOS
CVIE vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CVIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 1.55 | +0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.21 | 1.98 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 2.69 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.22 | 8.09 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CVIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.55 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | 0.00 | +1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CVIE and IPOS is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CVIE vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
CVIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than IPOS's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVIE Calvert International Responsible Index ETF | 2.57% | 2.85% | 2.78% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Drawdowns
CVIE vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVIE drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVIE and IPOS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CVIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -73.09% | +59.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.71% | -17.17% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -70.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.85% | -53.44% | +44.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -31.78% | +29.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 5.71% | -2.48% |
Volatility
CVIE vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert International Responsible Index ETF (CVIE) is 8.18%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that CVIE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CVIE | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 14.37% | -6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 24.21% | -11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.23% | 29.31% | -11.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 26.52% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.94% | 23.71% | -8.77% |