CURLF vs. SPYM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CURLF (Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, CURLF returned -25.54%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for SPYM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CURLF vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a 35.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 10.98% return.

CURLF

• 1D: -5.01%
• 1M: 4.60%
• YTD: 35.32%
• 6M: 39.75%
• 1Y: 315.85%
• 3Y*: 6.35%
• 5Y*: -25.54%
• 10Y*: —

SPYM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.06%
• YTD: 10.98%
• 6M: 10.98%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 22.46%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURLF vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	35.32%	61.54%	-61.58%	-5.52%	-52.25%	-24.82%	89.73%	33.12%	-18.97%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	10.98%	17.79%	25.00%	26.24%	-18.09%	28.78%	18.49%	31.99%	-4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and SPYM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018	0.22

Return for Risk

CURLF vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF

CURLF Risk / Return Rank: 89
CURLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CURLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
CURLF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CURLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CURLF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SPYM

SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CURLF	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.39	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.27	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.32	3.17	+2.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.98	14.76	-4.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CURLF vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CURLF	SPYM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.39	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.29	0.83	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.08	0.62	-0.70

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -95.70%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and SPYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURLF	SPYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.70%	-54.46%	-41.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.79%	-8.90%	-50.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.28%	-18.72%	-69.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.06%	-24.48%	-70.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.06%	-0.66%	-79.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.26%	-7.15%	-51.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.82%	1.91%	+29.91%

Volatility

CURLF vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 25.97% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.83%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CURLF	SPYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.97%	2.83%	+23.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	86.97%	8.90%	+78.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	128.15%	11.80%	+116.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	87.95%	16.80%	+71.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.26%	18.00%	+66.26%

Dividends

CURLF vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

CURLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.79%	2.23%	1.75%	1.97%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CURLF and SPYM in my portfolio?

CURLF and SPYM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CURLF or SPYM?

CURLF has higher volatility (25.97%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURLF dropped -95.70% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CURLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.