PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CURLF vs. ACB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CURLFACB
YTD Return-45.32%-11.80%
1Y Return-34.32%-9.68%
3Y Return (Ann)-39.43%-63.14%
5Y Return (Ann)-17.33%-58.22%
Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.09
Sortino Ratio-0.080.70
Omega Ratio0.991.08
Calmar Ratio-0.38-0.10
Martin Ratio-1.03-0.31
Ulcer Index33.41%30.94%
Daily Std Dev85.72%102.84%
Max Drawdown-90.78%-99.80%
Current Drawdown-87.67%-99.70%

Fundamentals


CURLFACB
Market Cap$1.54B$259.62M
EPS-$0.28-$0.48
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.03B$215.27M
Gross Profit (TTM)$477.56M$115.52M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CURLF and ACB is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CURLF vs. ACB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a -45.32% return, which is significantly lower than ACB's -11.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.29%
-43.27%
CURLF
ACB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CURLF vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CURLF, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.03
ACB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ACB, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.70
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ACB, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.08
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ACB, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.31

CURLF vs. ACB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the ACB Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and ACB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.40
-0.09
CURLF
ACB

Dividends

CURLF vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -90.78%, smaller than the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and ACB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-87.67%
-99.65%
CURLF
ACB

Volatility

CURLF vs. ACB - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 53.60% compared to Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB) at 25.48%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
53.60%
25.48%
CURLF
ACB

Financials

CURLF vs. ACB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Aurora Cannabis Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items