CURLF vs. ACB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CURLF (Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.) and ACB (Aurora Cannabis Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CURLF vs. ACB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CURLF

• 1D: -66.67%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACB

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -17.63%
• YTD: -32.46%
• 6M: -38.71%
• 1Y: -27.11%
• 3Y*: -19.74%
• 5Y*: -50.25%
• 10Y*: -23.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CURLF vs. ACB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	-66.67%
ACB Aurora Cannabis Inc.	-18.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and ACB is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap CURLF : $2.82B ACB : $163.79M
EPS CURLF : -$0.13 ACB : -CA$1.33
PS Ratio CURLF : 2.15 ACB : 0.73
PB Ratio CURLF : 3.43 ACB : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) CURLF : $1.30B ACB : CA$310.87M
Gross Profit (TTM) CURLF : $528.91M ACB : CA$176.08M
EBITDA (TTM) CURLF : $188.46M ACB : CA$10.48M

Return for Risk

CURLF vs. ACB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CURLF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACB

ACB Risk / Return Rank: 25
ACB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
ACB Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ACB Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACB Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CURLF vs. ACB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Aurora Cannabis Inc. (ACB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CURLF	ACB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.97	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.85	—

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. ACB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, smaller than the maximum ACB drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and ACB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURLF	ACB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.67%	-99.80%	+33.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-54.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-71.00%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.67%	-99.80%	+33.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.67%	-70.72%	+4.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	31.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CURLF	ACB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	65.27%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	89.74%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	97.78%	—

Dividends

CURLF vs. ACB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor ACB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CURLF and ACB in my portfolio?

CURLF and ACB have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.