CURLF vs. CGC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CURLF (Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.) and CGC (Canopy Growth Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic industry within the Healthcare sector. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CURLF vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CURLF

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 142.58%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CGC

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -8.27%
• 6M: -15.84%
• YTD: -19.54%
• 1Y: -12.64%
• 3Y*: -42.07%
• 5Y*: -65.55%
• 10Y*: -28.19%
• ALL TIME*: -23.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation	$2.09M	$2.86M	$5.51M
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	$1.09M	$1.13M	$1.07M

CURLF vs. CGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CURLF Curaleaf Holdings, Inc.	-19.14%
CGC Canopy Growth Corporation	-11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and CGC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2026	0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap CURLF : $2.33B CGC : $387.24M
EPS CURLF : -$0.13 CGC : -CA$1.09
PS Ratio CURLF : 5.24 CGC : 1.38
PB Ratio CURLF : 8.31 CGC : 0.71
Total Revenue (TTM) CURLF : $1.30B CGC : CA$312.34M
Gross Profit (TTM) CURLF : $528.91M CGC : CA$77.66M
EBITDA (TTM) CURLF : $188.46M CGC : -CA$205.34M

Return for Risk

CURLF vs. CGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CURLF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CGC

CGC Risk / Return Rank: 43
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CURLF vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CURLF	CGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.11	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.64	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.07	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.28	—

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -66.67%, smaller than the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and CGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CURLF	CGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.67%	-99.85%	+33.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-55.38%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-95.10%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.57%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-99.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.14%	-99.84%	+80.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.39%	-62.55%	+45.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	39.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CURLF	CGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.63%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	41.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	616.47%	100.77%	+515.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	616.47%	124.17%	+492.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	616.47%	103.27%	+513.20%

Dividends

CURLF vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CURLF and CGC in my portfolio?

CURLF and CGC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.