PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CURLF vs. CGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CURLF and CGC is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

CURLF vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-74.53%
-99.14%
CURLF
CGC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CURLF:

-0.70

CGC:

-0.28

Sortino Ratio

CURLF:

-0.90

CGC:

0.55

Omega Ratio

CURLF:

0.89

CGC:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

CURLF:

-0.65

CGC:

-0.41

Martin Ratio

CURLF:

-1.49

CGC:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

CURLF:

39.92%

CGC:

52.05%

Daily Std Dev

CURLF:

84.29%

CGC:

148.10%

Max Drawdown

CURLF:

-91.83%

CGC:

-99.52%

Current Drawdown

CURLF:

-91.72%

CGC:

-99.50%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CURLF:

$1.22B

CGC:

$452.86M

EPS

CURLF:

-$0.28

CGC:

-$5.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

CURLF:

$1.36B

CGC:

$280.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CURLF:

$638.08M

CGC:

$81.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a -63.30% return, which is significantly lower than CGC's -44.62% return.


CURLF

YTD

-63.30%

1M

-28.88%

6M

-62.75%

1Y

-57.43%

5Y*

-23.35%

10Y*

N/A

CGC

YTD

-44.62%

1M

-24.73%

6M

-58.69%

1Y

-37.25%

5Y*

-57.40%

10Y*

-16.86%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CURLF vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.70, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.70-0.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.900.55
The chart of Omega ratio for CURLF, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.891.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.65, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.65-0.41
The chart of Martin ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -1.49, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.00-1.49-0.79
CURLF
CGC

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and CGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.70
-0.28
CURLF
CGC

Dividends

CURLF vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -91.83%, smaller than the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and CGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-91.72%
-99.46%
CURLF
CGC

Volatility

CURLF vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 18.72% compared to Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) at 17.33%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
18.72%
17.33%
CURLF
CGC

Financials

CURLF vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab