PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CURLF vs. CGC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CURLFCGC
YTD Return-45.32%-27.01%
1Y Return-34.32%-29.73%
3Y Return (Ann)-39.43%-70.49%
5Y Return (Ann)-17.33%-52.50%
Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.21
Sortino Ratio-0.080.82
Omega Ratio0.991.09
Calmar Ratio-0.38-0.31
Martin Ratio-1.03-0.62
Ulcer Index33.41%50.63%
Daily Std Dev85.72%152.66%
Max Drawdown-90.78%-99.51%
Current Drawdown-87.67%-99.34%

Fundamentals


CURLFCGC
Market Cap$1.54B$533.71M
EPS-$0.28-$4.99
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.03B$254.58M
Gross Profit (TTM)$477.56M$68.58M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CURLF and CGC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CURLF vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CURLF achieves a -45.32% return, which is significantly lower than CGC's -27.01% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-60.29%
-65.55%
CURLF
CGC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CURLF vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CURLF
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.40
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.08
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CURLF, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CURLF, currently valued at -1.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-1.03
CGC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.21
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CGC, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CGC, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.09
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CGC, currently valued at -0.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.62

CURLF vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CURLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CURLF and CGC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.40
-0.21
CURLF
CGC

Dividends

CURLF vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CURLF nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CURLF vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CURLF drawdown since its inception was -90.78%, smaller than the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURLF and CGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-95.00%-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-87.67%
-99.29%
CURLF
CGC

Volatility

CURLF vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. (CURLF) has a higher volatility of 53.60% compared to Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) at 36.51%. This indicates that CURLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
53.60%
36.51%
CURLF
CGC

Financials

CURLF vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Curaleaf Holdings, Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items