CURE vs. YINN
CURE (Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares) and YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - CURE tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index (300%) while YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CURE returned 13.49%/yr vs -18.37%/yr for YINN. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CURE charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for YINN.
Performance
CURE vs. YINN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CURE achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -29.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CURE has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of 13.49%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -18.37% annualized return.
CURE
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 13.53%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 6M
- -6.00%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
YINN
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -23.37%
- YTD
- -29.95%
- 6M
- -32.53%
- 1Y
- -27.68%
- 3Y*
- -6.43%
- 5Y*
- -38.50%
- 10Y*
- -18.37%
CURE vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | -7.96% | 22.55% | -8.47% | -9.40% | -20.51% | 88.30% | 5.02% | 55.66% | 2.82% | 69.32% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -29.95% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CURE and YINN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011 | 0.38 |
The correlation between CURE and YINN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CURE vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CURE
YINN
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
CURE
YINN
Basic Materials
CURE
-
YINN
Communication Services
CURE
-
YINN
Consumer Cyclical
CURE
-
YINN
Consumer Defensive
CURE
-
YINN
Energy
CURE
-
YINN
Financial Services
CURE
-
YINN
Industrials
CURE
-
YINN
Real Estate
CURE
-
YINN
Technology
CURE
-
YINN
Utilities
CURE
-
YINN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CURE vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank
CURE
YINN
CURE vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CURE | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.96 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | -0.56 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.94 | -1.09 | +3.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CURE vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CURE drawdown since its inception was -69.19%, smaller than the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CURE and YINN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CURE | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.19% | -98.87% | +29.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.10% | -49.61% | +18.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.93% | -69.08% | +17.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.23% | -96.28% | +44.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.19% | -98.59% | +29.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.94% | -97.52% | +70.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.16% | -68.51% | +50.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.71% | 25.53% | -11.82% |
Volatility
CURE vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares (CURE) is 14.30%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.63%. This indicates that CURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CURE | YINN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.30% | 18.63% | -4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 42.54% | -11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.32% | 58.74% | -14.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.84% | 94.19% | -50.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.59% | 81.73% | -32.14% |
CURE vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CURE has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
CURE vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison
CURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than YINN's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CURE Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3x Shares | 1.16% | 1.12% | 1.17% | 2.02% | 0.38% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.40% | 0.70% | 0.18% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.42% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CURE and YINN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to CURE (14.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CURE dropped -69.19% vs YINN's -98.87%.
On 10-year performance, CURE leads with 13.49% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, CURE is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, CURE has been the lower-risk option at 14.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CURE has performed better with a 13.49% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CURE is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
YINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.16% for CURE.
CURE tracks Health Care Select Sector Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CURE and 1.52% for YINN.
CURE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CURE and YINN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer