CTIF vs. AMDY
CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) and AMDY (YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Over the past year, CTIF returned 6.93% vs 186.36% for AMDY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTIF charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for AMDY.
Performance
CTIF vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 104.68% return.
CTIF
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDY
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 104.68%
- 6M
- 104.89%
- 1Y
- 186.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTIF vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.33% | 3.87% |
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 104.68% | 43.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIF and AMDY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTIF vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank
CTIF
AMDY
CTIF vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTIF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.50 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 6.80 | -6.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.85 | 15.15 | -12.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTIF vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and AMDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -53.92% | +44.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -27.59% | +18.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -3.15% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -17.71% | +15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 12.35% | -9.75% |
Volatility
CTIF vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) is 4.07%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that CTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTIF | AMDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 20.26% | -16.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 43.47% | -33.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.58% | 56.01% | -43.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 46.84% | -34.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 46.84% | -34.26% |
CTIF vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTIF vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison
CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than AMDY's 63.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMDY YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | 63.23% | 80.68% | 109.98% | 6.68% |
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.72% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTIF and AMDY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDY has higher volatility (20.26%) compared to CTIF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIF dropped -9.43% vs AMDY's -53.92%.
On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 186.36% vs 6.93% for CTIF. On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 186.36% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.
AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 63.23%, compared with 3.72% for CTIF.
They also come from different issuers: Castellan and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 1.23% for AMDY.
AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTIF and AMDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer