PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIF vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTIF vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 3.33% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 104.68% return.


CTIF

1D
-0.92%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
3.33%
6M
2.10%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.43%
YTD
104.68%
6M
104.89%
1Y
186.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTIF vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CTIF and AMDY is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTIF vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTIF
CTIF Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTIF vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTIFAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.50

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

6.80

-6.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.85

15.15

-12.30

CTIF vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTIF and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTIF vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIFAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-53.92%

+44.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-27.59%

+18.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-3.15%

+0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-17.71%

+15.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

12.35%

-9.75%

Volatility

CTIF vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) is 4.07%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.26%. This indicates that CTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTIFAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

20.26%

-16.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

43.47%

-33.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.58%

56.01%

-43.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.58%

46.84%

-34.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

46.84%

-34.26%

CTIF vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTIF vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than AMDY's 63.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
63.23%80.68%109.98%6.68%
CTIF
Castellan Targeted Income ETF
3.72%2.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTIF and AMDY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.26%) compared to CTIF (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIF dropped -9.43% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 186.36% vs 6.93% for CTIF. On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CTIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 186.36% return vs 6.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 63.23%, compared with 3.72% for CTIF.

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and YieldMax ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 1.23% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTIF and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer