CTGO vs. KGC
CTGO (Contango Ore, Inc.) and KGC (Kinross Gold Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, CTGO returned 5.92%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for KGC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTGO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -40.78% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's -10.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CTGO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 5.92%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 18.52% annualized return.
CTGO
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -24.08%
- YTD
- -40.78%
- 6M
- -46.11%
- 1Y
- -26.50%
- 3Y*
- -13.90%
- 5Y*
- -6.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
KGC
- 1D
- -4.90%
- 1M
- -11.59%
- YTD
- -10.95%
- 6M
- -14.85%
- 1Y
- 60.18%
- 3Y*
- 77.91%
- 5Y*
- 33.48%
- 10Y*
- 18.52%
CTGO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | -40.78% | 163.57% | -44.67% | -20.99% | -10.47% | 36.53% | 29.31% | -17.14% | -3.58% | -7.40% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | -10.95% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTGO and KGC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011 | 0.11 |
Over the past year, CTGO and KGC have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.11, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CTGO:
$269.66M
KGC:
$30.11B
CTGO:
-$1.96
KGC:
$2.35
CTGO:
0.84
KGC:
3.30
CTGO:
$0.00
KGC:
$7.94B
CTGO:
-$158.43K
KGC:
$4.19B
CTGO:
-$20.93M
KGC:
$5.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTGO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
CTGO
KGC
CTGO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.22 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.60 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | 4.49 | -5.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTGO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and KGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.86% | -96.00% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.80% | -37.69% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.98% | -37.69% | -29.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -55.22% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.87% | -67.75% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.75% | -34.13% | -18.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.06% | -57.58% | +18.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.36% | 13.45% | +8.91% |
Volatility
CTGO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 20.43% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 18.00%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.43% | 18.00% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.74% | 41.32% | +11.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.22% | 52.16% | +11.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.30% | 44.19% | +17.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.56% | 47.07% | +29.49% |
Dividends
CTGO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
CTGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.58% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
Financials
CTGO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Contango Ore, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CTGO and KGC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTGO has higher volatility (20.43%) compared to KGC (18.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTGO dropped -86.86% vs KGC's -96.00%.
KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTGO and KGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer