CTGO vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Performance
CTGO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CTGO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | -29.00% | 163.57% | -44.67% | -20.99% | -10.47% | 36.53% | 29.31% | -17.14% | -3.58% | -7.40% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 8.51% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Fundamentals
CTGO:
$280.62M
KGC:
$36.89B
CTGO:
-$2.73
KGC:
$1.97
CTGO:
11.18
KGC:
4.31
CTGO:
$0.00
KGC:
$7.06B
CTGO:
-$192.05K
KGC:
$3.48B
CTGO:
-$45.28M
KGC:
$4.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -29.00% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 8.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CTGO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 18.31%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.
CTGO
- 1D
- 11.61%
- 1M
- -37.65%
- YTD
- -29.00%
- 6M
- -24.79%
- 1Y
- 83.64%
- 3Y*
- -13.03%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 18.31%
KGC
- 1D
- 6.71%
- 1M
- -17.39%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 143.53%
- 3Y*
- 89.08%
- 5Y*
- 36.79%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTGO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
CTGO
KGC
CTGO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 2.87 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 2.89 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 4.83 | -3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 17.11 | -10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 2.87 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.85 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.54 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.08 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between CTGO and KGC is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CTGO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
CTGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.44% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
CTGO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and KGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.86% | -96.00% | +9.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.58% | -30.20% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -61.44% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.87% | -67.75% | -5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.35% | -19.73% | -23.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.11% | -57.85% | +18.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.58% | 8.52% | +5.06% |
Volatility
CTGO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 17.82%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CTGO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.58% | 17.82% | +4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.85% | 40.92% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.68% | 50.25% | +14.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.53% | 43.55% | +18.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.84% | 47.66% | +35.18% |
Financials
CTGO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Contango Ore, Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities