PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTGO vs. SIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTGO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -37.03% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -8.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CTGO having a 6.27% annualized return and SIL not far behind at 6.10%.


CTGO

1D
-3.26%
1M
0.79%
6M
-39.11%
YTD
-37.03%
1Y
-15.75%
3Y*
-10.35%
5Y*
-5.44%
10Y*
6.27%

SIL

1D
-3.98%
1M
-3.34%
6M
-14.39%
YTD
-8.24%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
46.61%
5Y*
14.37%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTGO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTGO
Contango Ore, Inc.
-37.03%163.57%-44.67%-20.99%-10.47%36.53%29.31%-17.14%-3.58%-7.40%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
-8.24%166.16%14.62%1.31%-22.83%-18.35%40.30%34.78%-22.42%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CTGO and SIL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011

0.13

Over the past year, CTGO and SIL have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTGO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTGO
CTGO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CTGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTGO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CTGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTGO Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SIL
SIL Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTGO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTGOSILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.20

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

1.50

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

3.48

-4.13

CTGO vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTGO Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTGO and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTGO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and SIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTGOSILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.86%

-82.99%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.20%

-37.08%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.98%

-37.08%

-29.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.48%

-48.73%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.87%

-63.04%

-9.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.76%

-35.07%

-14.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.09%

-51.33%

+12.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.32%

15.94%

+8.38%

Volatility

CTGO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) at 18.95%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTGOSILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.32%

18.95%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.83%

44.25%

+8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.37%

52.86%

+10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.51%

39.95%

+21.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

39.81%

+35.70%

Dividends

CTGO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

CTGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTGO
Contango Ore, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIL
Global X Silver Miners ETF
1.33%1.18%2.40%0.59%0.48%1.59%1.92%1.53%1.21%0.02%3.34%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTGO and SIL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTGO has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to SIL (18.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTGO dropped -86.86% vs SIL's -82.99%.

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTGO and SIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer