CTGO vs. SIL
CTGO (Contango Ore, Inc.) is a stock, while SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) is Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Over the past 10 years, CTGO returned 4.41%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for SIL. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CTGO vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -40.25% return, which is significantly lower than SIL's -11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CTGO has underperformed SIL with an annualized return of 4.41%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.34% annualized return.
CTGO
- 1D
- -3.84%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- -51.54%
- YTD
- -40.25%
- 1Y
- -19.20%
- 3Y*
- -5.59%
- 5Y*
- -5.56%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.68%
SIL
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- 6M
- -34.27%
- YTD
- -11.29%
- 1Y
- 52.81%
- 3Y*
- 42.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.97M | $6.46M | $9.75M | |
| $65.19M | $70.81M | $124.45M |
CTGO vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | -40.25% | 163.57% | -44.67% | -20.99% | -10.47% | 36.53% | 29.31% | -17.14% | -3.58% | -7.40% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -11.29% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTGO and SIL is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, CTGO and SIL have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTGO vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
CTGO
SIL
CTGO vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTGO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 1.35 | -1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 2.90 | -3.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTGO vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTGO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.86% | -82.99% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.20% | -39.41% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.10% | -39.41% | -24.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -48.36% | -24.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.87% | -63.04% | -9.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.33% | -37.23% | -15.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.14% | -51.28% | +12.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.29% | 18.24% | +9.05% |
Volatility
CTGO vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 17.47% compared to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) at 11.98%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTGO | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.47% | 11.98% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.54% | 43.74% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.69% | 53.23% | +11.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.64% | 40.07% | +21.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.58% | 39.78% | +35.80% |
Dividends
CTGO vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
CTGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.37% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTGO and SIL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTGO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to SIL (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTGO dropped -86.86% vs SIL's -82.99%.
SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTGO and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer