CTGO vs. LYSDY
CTGO (Contango Ore, Inc.) and LYSDY (Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — CTGO in Gold, LYSDY in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past 10 years, CTGO returned 6.27%/yr vs 73.17%/yr for LYSDY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -37.03% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 43.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CTGO has underperformed LYSDY with an annualized return of 6.27%, while LYSDY has yielded a comparatively higher 73.17% annualized return.
CTGO
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- -39.11%
- YTD
- -37.03%
- 1Y
- -15.75%
- 3Y*
- -10.35%
- 5Y*
- -5.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
LYSDY
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 15.95%
- YTD
- 43.71%
- 1Y
- 119.69%
- 3Y*
- 35.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.41%
- 10Y*
- 73.17%
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc. | -37.03% | 163.57% | -44.67% | -20.99% | -10.47% | 36.53% | 29.31% | -17.14% | -3.58% | -7.40% |
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR | 43.71% | 109.37% | -18.22% | -8.17% | -29.21% | 144.41% | 79.88% | 50.87% | 489.58% | 258.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTGO and LYSDY is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2011 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, CTGO and LYSDY have become more correlated (0.27) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CTGO:
$203.10M
LYSDY:
$11.96B
CTGO:
-$1.87
LYSDY:
A$0.13
CTGO:
0.89
LYSDY:
5.01
CTGO:
$0.00
LYSDY:
A$1.19B
CTGO:
-$158.43K
LYSDY:
A$301.27M
CTGO:
-$20.93M
LYSDY:
A$236.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTGO vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank
CTGO
LYSDY
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTGO | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.29 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 2.59 | -2.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 5.30 | -5.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and LYSDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTGO | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.86% | -99.93% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.20% | -46.39% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.98% | -46.39% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.48% | -58.25% | -14.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.87% | -72.35% | -0.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.76% | -57.02% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.09% | -84.36% | +45.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.32% | 22.66% | +1.66% |
Volatility
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison
Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 21.32% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 14.84%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTGO | LYSDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.32% | 14.84% | +6.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.83% | 44.53% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.37% | 65.17% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.51% | 50.75% | +10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.51% | 278.46% | -202.95% |
Dividends
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison
Neither CTGO nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CTGO vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Contango Ore, Inc. and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CTGO and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTGO has higher volatility (21.32%) compared to LYSDY (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTGO dropped -86.86% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.
LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTGO and LYSDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer