CTGO vs. LYSDY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY).

Performance

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTGO Contango Ore, Inc.	-29.00%	163.57%	-44.67%	-20.99%	-10.47%	36.53%	29.31%	-17.14%	-3.58%	-7.40%
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	63.00%	109.37%	-18.22%	-8.17%	-29.21%	144.41%	79.88%	50.87%	489.58%	258.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CTGO : $280.62M LYSDY : $13.25B
EPS CTGO : -$2.73 LYSDY : $0.14
PB Ratio CTGO : 11.18 LYSDY : 3.94
Total Revenue (TTM) CTGO : $0.00 LYSDY : $1.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) CTGO : -$192.05K LYSDY : $301.27M
EBITDA (TTM) CTGO : -$45.28M LYSDY : $236.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTGO achieves a -29.00% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 63.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CTGO has underperformed LYSDY with an annualized return of 18.31%, while LYSDY has yielded a comparatively higher 74.67% annualized return.

CTGO

• 1D: 11.61%
• 1M: -37.65%
• YTD: -29.00%
• 6M: -24.79%
• 1Y: 83.64%
• 3Y*: -13.03%
• 5Y*: -0.26%
• 10Y*: 18.31%

LYSDY

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 2.43%
• YTD: 63.00%
• 6M: 21.01%
• 1Y: 206.36%
• 3Y*: 47.04%
• 5Y*: 23.48%
• 10Y*: 74.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CTGO vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTGO

CTGO Risk / Return Rank: 78
CTGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
CTGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CTGO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CTGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CTGO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 92
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTGO	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	3.11	-1.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.14	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.40	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	4.32	-2.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	9.18	-2.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTGO and LYSDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTGO	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	3.11	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.47	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	0.27	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.03	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between CTGO and LYSDY is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CTGO nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTGO drawdown since its inception was -86.86%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTGO and LYSDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTGO	LYSDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.86%	-99.93%	+13.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.58%	-46.39%	-3.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.48%	-58.25%	-14.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.87%	-72.35%	-0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.35%	-51.25%	+7.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.11%	-84.93%	+45.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.58%	21.85%	-8.27%

Volatility

CTGO vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

Contango Ore, Inc. (CTGO) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 21.19%. This indicates that CTGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTGO	LYSDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.58%	21.19%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.85%	53.17%	-7.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.68%	66.76%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.53%	50.33%	+12.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.84%	279.49%	-196.65%

Financials