CTEX vs. XLE
CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 16.51%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for XLE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
CTEX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.17% return.
CTEX
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 39.97%
- 6M
- 41.91%
- 1Y
- 154.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 32.17%
- 6M
- 29.80%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 20.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
CTEX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 39.97% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.17% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEX and XLE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CTEX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CTEX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEX
XLE
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
CTEX
XLE
-
Technology
CTEX
XLE
-
Utilities
CTEX
XLE
-
Energy
CTEX
XLE
Consumer Cyclical
CTEX
XLE
-
Basic Materials
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Communication Services
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Financial Services
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
CTEX
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
CTEX
XLE
CTEX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.68 | 2.21 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.79 | 2.84 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 3.75 | +3.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.95 | 10.92 | +9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68 | 2.21 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.31 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CTEX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.31% | -71.26% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -12.05% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.83% | -20.14% | -36.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -6.15% | +2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.94% | -17.98% | -23.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 4.14% | +3.63% |
Volatility
CTEX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEX | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.79% | 8.25% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.89% | 16.58% | +13.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.32% | 20.53% | +21.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 26.02% | +17.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 29.59% | +13.71% |
CTEX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 1.50% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.54% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEX and XLE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEX has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 3-year performance, XLE leads with 17.46% vs 16.51% for CTEX. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XLE has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CTEX.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.50% for CTEX.
CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.08% for XLE.
CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEX and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer