PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEX vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than XLE's 32.17% return.


CTEX

1D
-4.08%
1M
24.08%
YTD
39.97%
6M
41.91%
1Y
154.30%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*

XLE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
32.17%
6M
29.80%
1Y
45.00%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
10.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEX vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
39.97%67.74%-20.38%-10.25%-20.38%-6.68%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.17%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and XLE is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.24

The correlation between CTEX and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CTEX vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CTEX
XLE

Industrials

48.9%

-

Technology

34.7%

-

Utilities

11.5%

-

Energy

3.0%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

CTEX
48.9%
XLE

-

Technology

CTEX
34.7%
XLE

-

Utilities

CTEX
11.5%
XLE

-

Energy

CTEX
3.0%
XLE
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CTEX
1.8%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Communication Services

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Financial Services

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

CTEX

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEX vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX
CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEXXLEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.68

2.21

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

2.84

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

3.75

+3.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.95

10.92

+9.02

CTEX vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEXXLEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

2.21

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.31

-0.20

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, roughly equal to the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEXXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.31%

-71.26%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

-12.05%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.83%

-20.14%

-36.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-6.15%

+2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-17.98%

-23.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

4.14%

+3.63%

Volatility

CTEX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 8.25%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEXXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.79%

8.25%

+7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.89%

16.58%

+13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.32%

20.53%

+21.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.30%

26.02%

+17.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.30%

29.59%

+13.71%

CTEX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than XLE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
1.50%2.17%0.57%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEX and XLE have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTEX has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 3-year performance, XLE leads with 17.46% vs 16.51% for CTEX. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XLE has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 16.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CTEX.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.50% for CTEX.

CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.08% for XLE.

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEX and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer