CTEX vs. UVXY
CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and UVXY (ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while UVXY is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 1.55%/yr vs -62.17%/yr for UVXY. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UVXY.
Performance
CTEX vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -34.93% return.
CTEX
- 1D
- -5.55%
- 1M
- -15.90%
- 6M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 59.46%
- 3Y*
- 1.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UVXY
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- 6M
- -33.79%
- YTD
- -34.93%
- 1Y
- -73.19%
- 3Y*
- -62.17%
- 5Y*
- -68.33%
- 10Y*
- -72.05%
CTEX vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 1.97% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | -34.93% | -65.32% | -50.90% | -87.70% | -44.81% | -49.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEX and UVXY is -0.49, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | -0.50 |
The correlation between CTEX and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEX vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank
CTEX
UVXY
CTEX vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTEX | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.82 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | -0.99 | +2.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | -1.48 | +7.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTEX vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and UVXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEX | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.31% | -100.00% | +29.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -73.88% | +43.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.62% | -95.42% | +38.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.12% | -100.00% | +69.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.35% | -98.76% | +57.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.29% | 49.56% | -39.27% |
Volatility
CTEX vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) is 15.88%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that CTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEX | UVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.88% | 17.16% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.05% | 66.78% | -32.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.56% | 85.47% | -39.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 103.82% | -60.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.74% | 112.00% | -68.26% |
CTEX vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEX vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison
CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 2.05% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% |
UVXY ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEX and UVXY have a correlation of -0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UVXY has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to CTEX (15.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs UVXY's -100.00%.
On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 1.55% vs -62.17% for UVXY. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CTEX has been the lower-risk option at 15.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 1.55% return vs -62.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.
CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.
CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while UVXY is Volatility. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.95% for UVXY.
CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEX and UVXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer