CTEX vs. SMOG
CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - CTEX tracks the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index while SMOG tracks the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 16.51%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for SMOG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SMOG.
Performance
CTEX vs. SMOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than SMOG's 18.16% return.
CTEX
- 1D
- -4.08%
- 1M
- 24.08%
- YTD
- 39.97%
- 6M
- 41.91%
- 1Y
- 154.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMOG
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 18.16%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 42.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
CTEX vs. SMOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 39.97% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 18.16% | 33.36% | -9.33% | 1.42% | -29.92% | 8.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEX and SMOG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.81 |
The correlation between CTEX and SMOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
CTEX vs. SMOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEX
SMOG
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
CTEX
SMOG
Technology
CTEX
SMOG
Utilities
CTEX
SMOG
Energy
CTEX
SMOG
Consumer Cyclical
CTEX
SMOG
Basic Materials
CTEX
-
SMOG
Communication Services
CTEX
-
SMOG
-
Consumer Defensive
CTEX
-
SMOG
-
Financial Services
CTEX
-
SMOG
Healthcare
CTEX
-
SMOG
-
Real Estate
CTEX
-
SMOG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEX vs. SMOG — Risk / Return Rank
CTEX
SMOG
CTEX vs. SMOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEX | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.18 | 4.80 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.95 | 13.62 | +6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEX | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68 | 2.07 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.07 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
CTEX vs. SMOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum SMOG drawdown of -84.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and SMOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEX | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.31% | -84.39% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.62% | -8.82% | -12.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.83% | -28.72% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.08% | -14.61% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.94% | -52.47% | +10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.77% | 3.10% | +4.67% |
Volatility
CTEX vs. SMOG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 15.79% compared to VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) at 7.43%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEX | SMOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.79% | 7.43% | +8.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.89% | 15.46% | +14.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.32% | 20.49% | +21.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 25.12% | +18.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 25.73% | +17.57% |
CTEX vs. SMOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOG's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEX vs. SMOG - Dividend Comparison
CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than SMOG's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 1.50% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.33% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEX and SMOG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEX has higher volatility (15.79%) compared to SMOG (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs SMOG's -84.39%.
On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 16.51% vs 10.86% for SMOG. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SMOG has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.
CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.33% for SMOG.
CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.61% for SMOG.
CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEX and SMOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer