PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEX vs. CNRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CTEX vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CTEX vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
-2.49%67.74%-20.38%-10.25%-20.38%-6.68%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.01%50.23%-14.48%-11.55%-7.98%-3.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's 1.01% return.


CTEX

1D
3.45%
1M
-4.04%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
13.04%
1Y
101.45%
3Y*
1.55%
5Y*
10Y*

CNRG

1D
3.67%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
1.01%
6M
8.19%
1Y
82.11%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CTEX vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CTEX vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX
CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CNRG
CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEXCNRGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

2.13

+0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.74

2.61

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

4.50

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.16

11.42

+1.73

CTEX vs. CNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and CNRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEXCNRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.13

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.50

-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and CNRG is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CTEX vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than CNRG's 1.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
2.15%2.17%0.57%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.37%1.46%1.34%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and CNRG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEXCNRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.31%

-68.49%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

-17.73%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.12%

-34.32%

+3.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.87%

-32.02%

-10.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.52%

6.99%

+0.53%

Volatility

CTEX vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 10.93%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CTEXCNRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

10.93%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.71%

29.55%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.74%

38.82%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.17%

33.78%

+9.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.17%

35.78%

+7.39%