CTEX vs. CNRG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) and CNRG (SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - CTEX tracks the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index while CNRG tracks the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CTEX returned 11.07%/yr vs 12.18%/yr for CNRG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CTEX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CNRG.

Performance

CTEX vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 20.77% return, which is significantly lower than CNRG's 23.15% return.

CTEX

• 1D: -6.36%
• 1M: -8.02%
• YTD: 20.77%
• 6M: 16.43%
• 1Y: 116.42%
• 3Y*: 11.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNRG

• 1D: -4.63%
• 1M: -5.18%
• YTD: 23.15%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 95.92%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: 2.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEX vs. CNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	20.77%	67.74%	-20.38%	-10.25%	-20.38%	-6.68%
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF	23.15%	50.23%	-14.48%	-11.55%	-7.98%	-2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and CNRG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021	0.98

The correlation between CTEX and CNRG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

CTEX vs. CNRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CTEX	CNRG
Industrials	38.2%	37.1%
Energy	36.3%	23.5%
Utilities	16.5%	27.1%
Technology	6.1%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	2.6%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CTEX vs. CNRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CNRG

CNRG Risk / Return Rank: 76
CNRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CNRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CNRG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CNRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNRG Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEX	CNRG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.53	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	2.94	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.35	5.36	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	13.03	+0.67

CTEX vs. CNRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and CNRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, roughly equal to the maximum CNRG drawdown of -68.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and CNRG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEX	CNRG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.31%	-68.49%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.90%	-18.01%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.83%	-48.77%	-8.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-59.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.23%	-19.92%	+2.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.61%	-31.72%	-9.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.53%	7.39%	+1.14%

Volatility

CTEX vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a higher volatility of 19.24% compared to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) at 15.67%. This indicates that CTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEX	CNRG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.24%	15.67%	+3.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.48%	27.25%	+5.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.17%	38.05%	+6.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.59%	34.47%	+9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.59%	35.98%	+7.61%

CTEX vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEX vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than CNRG's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CNRG SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF	1.11%	1.46%	1.34%	1.17%	1.23%	1.34%	0.69%	1.16%	0.35%
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	1.73%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEX and CNRG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, CTEX and CNRG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CTEX or CNRG?

CTEX has higher volatility (19.24%) compared to CNRG (15.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs CNRG's -68.49%.

Which ETF is better, CTEX or CNRG?

On 3-year performance, CNRG leads with 12.18% vs 11.07% for CTEX. On fees, CNRG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CNRG has been the lower-risk option at 15.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEX or CNRG?

Over the 3-year period, CNRG has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEX or CNRG?

CNRG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for CTEX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEX or CNRG?

CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 1.11% for CNRG.

What is the main difference between CTEX and CNRG?

CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while CNRG tracks S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.45% for CNRG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.