PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTEX vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTEX vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEX achieves a 39.97% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.


CTEX

1D
-4.08%
1M
24.08%
YTD
39.97%
6M
41.91%
1Y
154.30%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEX vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
39.97%67.74%-4.50%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEX and BITU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.36

CTEX vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CTEX
BITU

Industrials

48.9%

-

Technology

34.7%

-

Utilities

11.5%

-

Energy

3.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

CTEX
48.9%
BITU

-

Technology

CTEX
34.7%
BITU

-

Utilities

CTEX
11.5%
BITU

-

Energy

CTEX
3.0%
BITU

-

Consumer Cyclical

CTEX
1.8%
BITU

-

Basic Materials

CTEX

-

BITU

-

Communication Services

CTEX

-

BITU

-

Consumer Defensive

CTEX

-

BITU

-

Financial Services

CTEX

-

BITU
4.2%

Healthcare

CTEX

-

BITU

-

Real Estate

CTEX

-

BITU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTEX vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEX
CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEX vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTEXBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.68

-0.84

+4.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.79

-1.44

+5.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

0.84

+0.64

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

-0.93

+8.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.95

-1.47

+21.41

CTEX vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEX and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTEXBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

-0.84

+4.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

-0.35

+0.46

Drawdowns

CTEX vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEX drawdown since its inception was -70.31%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEX and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTEXBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.31%

-78.94%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

-78.94%

+57.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-78.94%

+74.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-34.49%

-7.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.77%

49.84%

-42.07%

Volatility

CTEX vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) is 15.79%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that CTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTEXBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.79%

18.99%

-3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.89%

69.41%

-39.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.32%

87.00%

-44.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.30%

97.45%

-54.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.30%

97.45%

-54.15%

CTEX vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTEX vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

CTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than BITU's 83.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%0.00%
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
1.50%2.17%0.57%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTEX and BITU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to CTEX (15.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEX dropped -70.31% vs BITU's -78.94%.

On 1-year performance, CTEX leads with 154.30% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, CTEX has been the lower-risk option at 15.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 154.30% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 1.50% for CTEX.

CTEX is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for CTEX and 0.95% for BITU.

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTEX and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer