CTEF vs. FFSM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) and FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FFSM.

Performance

CTEF vs. FFSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEF achieves a 29.35% return, which is significantly higher than FFSM's 18.92% return.

CTEF

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 10.65%
• YTD: 29.35%
• 6M: 31.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFSM

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 18.92%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 38.60%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEF vs. FFSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	29.35%	33.22%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	18.92%	16.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEF and FFSM is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

CTEF vs. FFSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSM

FFSM Risk / Return Rank: 69
FFSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FFSM Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FFSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FFSM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEF vs. FFSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF) and Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTEF	FFSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.54	0.59	+2.95

Drawdowns

CTEF vs. FFSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEF drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum FFSM drawdown of -26.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEF and FFSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEF	FFSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-26.65%	+11.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.57%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.80%	-7.86%	+6.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTEF	FFSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.70%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.81%	17.96%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.81%	20.66%	+1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.81%	20.57%	+1.24%

CTEF vs. FFSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSM's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEF vs. FFSM - Dividend Comparison

CTEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FFSM's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF	0.46%	0.56%	0.62%	0.56%	0.58%	0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEF and FFSM in my portfolio?

CTEF and FFSM have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTEF or FFSM?

On fees, FFSM is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEF or FFSM?

FFSM is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEF or FFSM?

FFSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.

What is the main difference between CTEF and FFSM?

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTEF and 0.43% for FFSM.