CTEC vs. PAVE
CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CTEC returned -3.59%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
CTEC vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 42.98% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 19.88% return.
CTEC
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- 11.16%
- YTD
- 42.98%
- 6M
- 39.64%
- 1Y
- 130.98%
- 3Y*
- 2.15%
- 5Y*
- -3.59%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEC vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 42.98% | 57.85% | -36.35% | -25.60% | -16.82% | -22.19% | 47.46% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEC and PAVE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between CTEC and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
CTEC vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEC
PAVE
Industrials
Energy
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
CTEC
PAVE
Energy
CTEC
PAVE
Technology
CTEC
PAVE
Basic Materials
CTEC
PAVE
Consumer Cyclical
CTEC
PAVE
-
Utilities
CTEC
PAVE
Communication Services
CTEC
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
CTEC
-
PAVE
Financial Services
CTEC
-
PAVE
-
Healthcare
CTEC
-
PAVE
-
Real Estate
CTEC
-
PAVE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEC vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
CTEC
PAVE
CTEC vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CTEC | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.34 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.48 | 3.13 | +4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.45 | 11.50 | +7.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTEC | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77 | 1.99 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.81 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.68 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
CTEC vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEC | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.58% | -44.08% | -37.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -11.91% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.77% | -26.23% | -39.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.46% | -26.23% | -50.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.76% | -1.82% | -43.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -6.24% | -46.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 3.24% | +3.52% |
Volatility
CTEC vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) has a higher volatility of 11.34% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.42%. This indicates that CTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEC | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.34% | 6.42% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.75% | 15.17% | +8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.94% | 18.84% | +16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 21.60% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.77% | 24.38% | +13.39% |
CTEC vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEC vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 0.52% | 0.75% | 1.56% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEC and PAVE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEC has higher volatility (11.34%) compared to PAVE (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -3.59% for CTEC. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CTEC.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.52% for CTEC.
CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. CTEC tracks Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 0.47% for PAVE.
CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.77 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEC and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer