CTEC vs. XLK
CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CTEC returned -7.77%/yr vs 21.34%/yr for XLK. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
CTEC vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return.
CTEC
- 1D
- -6.61%
- 1M
- -11.86%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 19.40%
- 1Y
- 97.04%
- 3Y*
- -1.56%
- 5Y*
- -7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
CTEC vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 22.71% | 57.85% | -36.35% | -25.60% | -16.82% | -22.19% | 44.74% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 16.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTEC and XLK is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.54 |
The correlation between CTEC and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CTEC vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CTEC
XLK
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
CTEC
XLK
Technology
CTEC
XLK
Energy
CTEC
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
CTEC
XLK
-
Basic Materials
CTEC
XLK
-
Utilities
CTEC
XLK
-
Communication Services
CTEC
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
CTEC
-
XLK
-
Financial Services
CTEC
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
CTEC
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
CTEC
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTEC vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
CTEC
XLK
CTEC vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTEC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 3.31 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 10.56 | +2.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTEC vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, roughly equal to the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTEC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.58% | -82.05% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.39% | -15.92% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.77% | -25.66% | -40.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.46% | -33.56% | -42.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.45% | -6.96% | -46.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.35% | -34.90% | -17.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.43% | 4.98% | +2.45% |
Volatility
CTEC vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 12.51%. This indicates that CTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTEC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.15% | 12.51% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.21% | 19.70% | +7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.40% | 23.48% | +13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 25.37% | +11.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.09% | 24.71% | +13.38% |
CTEC vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTEC vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF | 0.61% | 0.75% | 1.56% | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTEC and XLK have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEC has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to XLK (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 21.34% vs -7.77% for CTEC. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 21.34% return vs -7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CTEC.
CTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.43% for XLK.
CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. CTEC tracks Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 0.08% for XLK.
CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTEC and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer