CTEC vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CTEC (Global X CleanTech ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTEC is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CTEC returned 89.69% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTEC achieves a 25.04% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.57% return.

CTEC

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -8.45%
• YTD: 25.04%
• 6M: 20.35%
• 1Y: 89.69%
• 3Y*: -3.29%
• 5Y*: -6.60%
• 10Y*: —

NUKZ

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -5.07%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 4.81%
• 1Y: 27.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	25.04%	57.85%	-26.29%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.57%	56.57%	60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CTEC and NUKZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024	0.55

The correlation between CTEC and NUKZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CTEC	NUKZ
Industrials	46.3%	45.9%
Energy	24.8%	12.9%
Technology	13.8%	1.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	4.0%
Utilities	1.7%	35.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

CTEC vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTEC

CTEC Risk / Return Rank: 80
CTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
CTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 76

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTEC	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	0.92	+1.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	1.43	+1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.17	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	1.70	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.56	4.11	+8.45

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTEC and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTEC drawdown since its inception was -81.58%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTEC and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTEC	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.58%	-33.03%	-48.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.39%	-16.51%	-2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.57%	-10.39%	-42.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.35%	-6.06%	-46.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.16%	6.80%	+0.36%

Volatility

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Global X CleanTech ETF (CTEC) has a higher volatility of 15.44% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that CTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTEC	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.44%	11.24%	+4.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.72%	23.34%	+3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.93%	30.46%	+6.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.77%	32.94%	+3.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.02%	32.94%	+5.08%

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTEC vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

CTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CTEC Global X CleanTech ETF	0.60%	0.75%	1.56%	0.51%	0.25%	0.39%	0.02%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTEC and NUKZ in my portfolio?

CTEC and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTEC or NUKZ?

CTEC has higher volatility (15.44%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTEC dropped -81.58% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, CTEC or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, CTEC leads with 89.69% vs 27.91% for NUKZ. On fees, CTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CTEC or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, CTEC has performed better with a 89.69% return vs 27.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTEC or NUKZ?

CTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTEC or NUKZ?

NUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.60% for CTEC.

What is the main difference between CTEC and NUKZ?

CTEC is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. CTEC tracks Indxx Global CleanTech Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CTEC and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.