PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTAP vs. THRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTAP vs. THRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.79% return.


CTAP

1D
-1.08%
1M
-12.31%
YTD
8.42%
6M
7.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

THRV

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.79%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTAP vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CTAP and THRV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTAP vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CTAP vs. THRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTAP vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -15.19%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and THRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTAPTHRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.19%

-1.50%

-13.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.07%

-0.58%

-14.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-0.44%

-2.55%

Volatility

CTAP vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTAPTHRVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.37%

2.96%

+21.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

2.96%

+21.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.37%

2.96%

+21.41%

CTAP vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTAP vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison

CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than THRV's 5.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CTAP and THRV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 0.73% for CTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 1.80% for THRV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTAP and THRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer