CTA vs. JPFP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTA charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JPFP.

Performance

CTA vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CTA

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -2.66%
• 6M: -2.62%
• YTD: 0.06%
• 1Y: 0.36%
• 3Y*: 8.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPFP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTA vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	-8.85%
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF	-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CTA and JPFP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.16

Return for Risk

CTA vs. JPFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTA

CTA Risk / Return Rank: 10
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 10

JPFP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTA vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CTA	JPFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.05	—	—

Drawdowns

CTA vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTA drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -6.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTA and JPFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTA	JPFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.44%	-6.04%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.90%	-3.54%	-14.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-3.15%	-2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CTA	JPFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.97%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.59%	19.27%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.63%	19.27%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	19.27%	-2.64%

CTA vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTA has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

CTA vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison

CTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, while JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.02%	3.19%	4.80%	7.78%	6.58%
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTA and JPFP in my portfolio?

CTA and JPFP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CTA or JPFP?

On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CTA or JPFP?

JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CTA or JPFP?

CTA has the higher dividend yield at 5.02%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.

What is the main difference between CTA and JPFP?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for CTA and 0.59% for JPFP.