CSZIX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
CSZIX is an actively managed fund by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 1.50% | 4.41% | 6.81% | 13.26% | -26.21% | 41.81% | -1.64% | 31.95% | -4.17% | 8.18% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSZIX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, CSZIX has underperformed CSUIX with an annualized return of 6.42%, while CSUIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.
CSZIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSZIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CSZIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
CSZIX
CSUIX
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSZIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 1.67 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 2.21 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.33 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 2.42 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 10.58 | -9.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSZIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.67 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.53 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSZIX and CSUIX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
CSZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSZIX Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z | 3.10% | 3.81% | 2.85% | 3.00% | 7.77% | 4.38% | 5.47% | 7.70% | 3.68% | 2.60% | 5.90% | 22.32% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSZIX drawdown since its inception was -42.71%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSZIX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSZIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.71% | -52.01% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -7.99% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.05% | -20.01% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.71% | -35.01% | -7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -4.36% | -3.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -8.21% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 1.82% | +1.14% |
Volatility
CSZIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund Class Z (CSZIX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that CSZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSZIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.24% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.44% | 6.90% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 11.49% | +4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 12.86% | +5.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 14.88% | +5.91% |