CSV vs. MPAA
CSV (Carriage Services, Inc.) and MPAA (Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CSV in Personal Services, MPAA in Auto Parts. Over the past 10 years, CSV returned 6.74%/yr vs -6.20%/yr for MPAA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSV vs. MPAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSV achieves a -9.11% return, which is significantly lower than MPAA's 22.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CSV has outperformed MPAA with an annualized return of 6.74%, while MPAA has yielded a comparatively lower -6.20% annualized return.
CSV
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -12.51%
- YTD
- -9.11%
- 6M
- -10.44%
- 1Y
- -11.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
MPAA
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- 38.59%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 54.92%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- -8.21%
- 10Y*
- -6.20%
CSV vs. MPAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | -9.11% | 7.27% | 61.83% | -7.71% | -56.70% | 107.92% | 24.25% | 67.51% | -38.90% | -9.44% |
MPAA Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. | 22.53% | 62.37% | -18.63% | -21.25% | -30.52% | -13.00% | -10.94% | 32.39% | -33.41% | -7.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSV and MPAA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 1996 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CSV and MPAA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CSV:
$603.70M
MPAA:
$339.93M
CSV:
$2.81
MPAA:
$0.61
CSV:
13.62
MPAA:
24.98
CSV:
1.44
MPAA:
0.39
CSV:
2.26
MPAA:
1.28
CSV:
$416.49M
MPAA:
$789.81M
CSV:
$147.10M
MPAA:
$159.90M
CSV:
$108.36M
MPAA:
$68.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSV vs. MPAA — Risk / Return Rank
CSV
MPAA
CSV vs. MPAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) and Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSV | MPAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.23 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.19 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 2.08 | -3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSV vs. MPAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSV drawdown since its inception was -95.90%, roughly equal to the maximum MPAA drawdown of -97.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSV and MPAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSV | MPAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.90% | -97.82% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.58% | -46.31% | +18.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.56% | -53.34% | +12.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.52% | -81.84% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.52% | -86.63% | +18.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.34% | -62.43% | +24.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.39% | -51.33% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.78% | 26.46% | -15.68% |
Volatility
CSV vs. MPAA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carriage Services, Inc. (CSV) is 9.96%, while Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) has a volatility of 32.93%. This indicates that CSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSV | MPAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.96% | 32.93% | -22.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.31% | 45.49% | -26.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.70% | 68.59% | -42.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.80% | 62.99% | -26.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 55.61% | -18.67% |
Dividends
CSV vs. MPAA - Dividend Comparison
CSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while MPAA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSV Carriage Services, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.06% | 1.13% | 1.80% | 1.63% | 0.64% | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.94% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
MPAA Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CSV vs. MPAA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carriage Services, Inc. and Motorcar Parts of America, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CSV vs. MPAA - Profitability Comparison
CSV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 38.64M and revenue of 106.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.
MPAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. reported a gross profit of 50.38M and revenue of 212.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.
CSV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.28M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
MPAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.06M and revenue of 212.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
CSV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carriage Services, Inc. reported a net income of 13.49M and revenue of 106.12M, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
MPAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. reported a net income of 9.72M and revenue of 212.28M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CSV and MPAA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPAA has higher volatility (32.93%) compared to CSV (9.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSV dropped -95.90% vs MPAA's -97.82%.
MPAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSV and MPAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer