MPAA vs. BTAL

In the year-to-date period, MPAA achieves a 46.58% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's 4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MPAA has underperformed BTAL with an annualized return of -9.46%, while BTAL has yielded a comparatively higher 1.18% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MPAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPAA and BTAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MPAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%.

The maximum MPAA drawdown since its inception was -89.07%, which is greater than BTAL's maximum drawdown of -38.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPAA and BTAL.

Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. (MPAA) has a higher volatility of 14.97% compared to AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) at 5.73%. This indicates that MPAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.