CSUAX vs. ICBMX
CSUAX (Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and ICBMX (ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX returned 7.22%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for ICBMX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CSUAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for ICBMX.
Performance
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSUAX achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than ICBMX's 20.46% return. Over the past 10 years, CSUAX has underperformed ICBMX with an annualized return of 7.22%, while ICBMX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.01% annualized return.
CSUAX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 17.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.25%
ICBMX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 9.12%
- YTD
- 20.46%
- 1Y
- 39.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.28%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 12.09% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 20.46% | 15.95% | 21.25% | 11.02% | 0.50% | 30.63% | 5.53% | 22.11% | -17.38% | 16.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSUAX and ICBMX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2004 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CSUAX and ICBMX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSUAX vs. ICBMX — Risk / Return Rank
CSUAX
ICBMX
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) and ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSUAX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.57 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 12.44 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSUAX drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum ICBMX drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSUAX and ICBMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSUAX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.20% | -63.92% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.99% | -10.10% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | -26.49% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.45% | -26.49% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.05% | -48.18% | +13.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -1.54% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -17.79% | +9.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.90% | -1.00% |
Volatility
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) is 2.93%, while ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund (ICBMX) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that CSUAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICBMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSUAX | ICBMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 3.51% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 12.95% | -4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 19.77% | -9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 20.60% | -7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.88% | 22.23% | -7.35% |
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSUAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ICBMX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSUAX vs. ICBMX - Dividend Comparison
CSUAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, less than ICBMX's 8.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.63% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
ICBMX ICON Natural Resources and Infrastructure Fund | 8.31% | 10.01% | 17.24% | 7.07% | 11.07% | 1.32% | 0.32% | 1.55% | 21.58% | 1.19% | 0.53% | 7.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSUAX and ICBMX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICBMX has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to CSUAX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSUAX dropped -52.20% vs ICBMX's -63.92%.
ICBMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSUAX and ICBMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer