CSU.TO vs. MC.PA
CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) and MC.PA (LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne) are both stocks. CSU.TO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while MC.PA operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO returned 19.62%/yr vs 17.47%/yr for MC.PA. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CSU.TO is traded in CAD, while MC.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MC.PA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's -19.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has outperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 19.62%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 17.47% annualized return.
CSU.TO
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- 15.43%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- 1Y
- -39.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
MC.PA
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- -19.17%
- 6M
- -16.96%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- -10.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- 17.47%
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -11.38% | -25.63% | 35.48% | 55.70% | -9.70% | 42.28% | 31.55% | 47.35% | 15.20% | 25.68% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | -19.17% | 12.51% | -10.18% | 10.38% | -4.81% | 33.97% | 32.48% | 53.41% | 10.90% | 46.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSU.TO and MC.PA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007 | 0.16 |
The correlation between CSU.TO and MC.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank
CSU.TO
MC.PA
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSU.TO | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.11 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 0.44 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 0.88 | -2.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and MC.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSU.TO | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -50.00% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.16% | -31.73% | -23.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.38% | -44.27% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.38% | -45.31% | -11.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.38% | -45.31% | -11.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.48% | -34.10% | -9.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.97% | -11.35% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.99% | 15.87% | +20.12% |
Volatility
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) at 8.59%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSU.TO | MC.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 8.59% | +5.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 22.98% | +11.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.43% | 32.76% | +8.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.53% | 32.62% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 30.01% | -2.57% |
Dividends
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison
CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than MC.PA's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.17% | 0.32% | 1.85% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.71% | 0.81% |
MC.PA LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne | 2.55% | 2.02% | 2.05% | 1.70% | 1.76% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.50% | 2.09% | 1.71% | 1.98% | 2.28% |
Financials
CSU.TO vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CSU.TO and MC.PA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CSU.TO and MC.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer