CSU.TO vs. BAM
Compare and contrast key facts about Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CSU.TO or BAM.
Performance
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a 35.57% return, which is significantly lower than BAM's 42.05% return.
CSU.TO
35.57%
0.41%
20.49%
41.26%
29.34%
32.74%
BAM
42.05%
7.60%
39.65%
71.58%
N/A
N/A
Fundamentals
| CSU.TO | BAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$94.29B | $23.47B |
| EPS | CA$43.16 | $1.09 |
| PE Ratio | 103.09 | 50.89 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.21 | 4.84 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$7.14B | $1.36B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$6.35B | $824.36M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$1.41B | $760.00M |
Key characteristics
| CSU.TO | BAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.88 | 2.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.49 | 3.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.57 | 6.15 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.71 | 14.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.49% | 5.11% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.85% | 25.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.93% | -20.47% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.71% | -4.03% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between CSU.TO and BAM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Dividend Comparison
CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BAM's 2.63% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 2.78% | 0.66% | 0.74% | 0.94% | 0.99% | 1.42% | 2.01% |
BAM Brookfield Asset Management Inc. | 2.63% | 3.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than BAM's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and BAM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Volatility Comparison
Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (BAM) have volatilities of 7.00% and 7.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CSU.TO vs. BAM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and Brookfield Asset Management Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities