PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CSU.TO vs. CNQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CSU.TOCNQ
YTD Return10.13%15.61%
1Y Return32.61%36.96%
3Y Return (Ann)27.40%42.16%
5Y Return (Ann)28.27%28.66%
10Y Return (Ann)32.49%10.93%
Sharpe Ratio1.561.06
Daily Std Dev22.11%28.31%
Max Drawdown-25.95%-81.38%
Current Drawdown-6.10%-8.95%

Fundamentals


CSU.TOCNQ
Market CapCA$77.03B$83.52B
EPSCA$36.71$5.45
PE Ratio99.0214.31
PEG Ratio2.0412.75
Revenue (TTM)CA$8.41B$35.97B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$2.32B$23.61B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$1.60B$16.51B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CSU.TO and CNQ is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ's 15.61% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has outperformed CNQ with an annualized return of 32.49%, while CNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22,100.53%
393.95%
CSU.TO
CNQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Constellation Software Inc.

Canadian Natural Resources Limited

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CSU.TO, currently valued at 8.95, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.95
CNQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CNQ, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CNQ, currently valued at 1.94, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CNQ, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CNQ, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.27
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CNQ, currently valued at 8.73, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.73

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the CNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CSU.TO and CNQ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.44
1.37
CSU.TO
CNQ

Dividends

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Dividend Comparison

CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than CNQ's 3.81% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CSU.TO
Constellation Software Inc.
0.11%0.12%0.19%0.25%2.84%31.30%7.53%8.63%10.78%19,020.03%19.05%29.24%
CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
3.81%4.17%6.29%3.69%5.14%3.42%4.52%2.34%2.19%3.20%2.58%1.60%

Drawdowns

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, smaller than the maximum CNQ drawdown of -81.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and CNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.90%
-8.95%
CSU.TO
CNQ

Volatility

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) at 5.89%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.45%
5.89%
CSU.TO
CNQ

Financials

CSU.TO vs. CNQ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Constellation Software Inc. and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. CSU.TO values in CAD, CNQ values in USD