CSU.TO vs. BND.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) is a stock, while BND.TO (Purpose Global Bond Fund) is fund fund. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO returned 19.78%/yr vs 3.00%/yr for BND.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSU.TO achieves a -16.65% return, which is significantly lower than BND.TO's 0.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CSU.TO has outperformed BND.TO with an annualized return of 19.78%, while BND.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.00% annualized return.

CSU.TO

• 1D: -4.67%
• 1M: 11.30%
• YTD: -16.65%
• 6M: -16.41%
• 1Y: -44.30%
• 3Y*: -0.15%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: 19.78%

BND.TO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 0.89%
• 6M: 1.18%
• 1Y: 6.14%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 3.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc.	-16.65%	-25.63%	35.48%	58.92%	-9.69%	42.35%	41.33%	48.51%	15.31%	25.83%
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund	0.89%	7.23%	7.49%	8.45%	-7.80%	2.85%	6.14%	4.16%	-0.91%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CSU.TO and BND.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2015	0.09

Return for Risk

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSU.TO

CSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7
CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 12

BND.TO

BND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
BND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
BND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) and Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CSU.TO	BND.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	2.02	-3.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.65	2.93	-4.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.38	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	2.17	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	8.87	-10.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the BND.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSU.TO and BND.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CSU.TO	BND.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	2.02	-3.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.64	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.59	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.18	0.61	+0.57

Drawdowns

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than BND.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSU.TO and BND.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CSU.TO	BND.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.38%	-16.55%	-39.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.16%	-2.84%	-52.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.38%	-4.46%	-51.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.38%	-12.23%	-44.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.38%	-16.55%	-39.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.84%	-0.45%	-46.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.84%	-2.07%	-4.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.35%	0.69%	+34.66%

Volatility

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Volatility Comparison

Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.72% compared to Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) at 1.35%. This indicates that CSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CSU.TO	BND.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.72%	1.35%	+13.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.67%	2.52%	+30.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.26%	3.06%	+37.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.20%	5.10%	+23.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.25%	5.15%	+22.10%

Dividends

CSU.TO vs. BND.TO - Dividend Comparison

CSU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than BND.TO's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BND.TO Purpose Global Bond Fund	5.86%	5.70%	5.24%	5.20%	4.14%	3.89%	3.48%	3.11%	3.96%	3.47%	3.26%	0.53%
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc.	0.20%	0.17%	0.12%	0.16%	0.25%	0.21%	0.30%	2.53%	0.60%	0.68%	0.86%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CSU.TO and BND.TO in my portfolio?

CSU.TO and BND.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.